Török Edwin wrote:
> Scanning test/.split works here:
Thanks, I'm probably hitting an obscure system bug...
> What OS/compiler are you using?
...in unsupported Cygwin. Almost everything else seems to work,
exceptions being 'clamscan --debug', and the programs used to check the
build.
I'll che
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
> John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Do you have any thoughts about how we can get the stats to you, so that
>> you can use them, without bypassing our mechanism for ensuring
>> consistent and safe updating of our virus signatures?
>
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 09:11:16PM -0500, René Berber wrote:
> Has anyone seen a problem testing with the contents of test/.split?
>
> In particular 'clamscan test/.split/split.clam.exe.htmlaa' just holds
> the CPU at 100% for a long time... I've killed it on two runs.
no problem here:
test/.sp
Compiles cleanly on OpenBSD 4.3 Release i386 on AMD Opteron
Best regards,
Walter.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Hi,
We've got a user whose files are being detected as
"Worm.Mydoom.M.log". These ones all happen to be PDF files saved
from Word 2007.
There is an example at the following URL:
http://www.le.ac.uk/its/mcn4/clamav/incorrect_mydoom_detect.pdf
I submitted the file via the clamav web page a few day
> Hi,
>
> We've got a user whose files are being detected as
> "Worm.Mydoom.M.log". These ones all happen to be PDF files saved
> from Word 2007.
I know this doesn't help... but...looks like that name is a "special" hard
coded name:
special.c:
int cli_check_mydoom_log(int desc, const char **vir
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:14:20 +0100
Matthew Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've got a user whose files are being detected as
> "Worm.Mydoom.M.log". These ones all happen to be PDF files saved
> from Word 2007.
>
> There is an example at the following URL:
> http://www.le.ac.uk/its/m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gcc 4.0.1 caused configuration failure with PR bug 28045
Just a FYI...
Apple has released a new Xcode pack with a working gcc. It's a bit
annoying as it requires to register on apple developers site and to
download a whole dvd image but it works perfectly with -O2
-aCa
Hi,
Thanks both for the useful info.
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:54:52AM +0100, Steve Basford wrote:
> I know this doesn't help... but...looks like that name is a "special" hard
> coded name:
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 01:32:38PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> as a temporary solution you can run the fo
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:53:08 +0100
Matthew Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's great, thanks - all test files I have now scan OK.
>
> Does the above alter much else in the scanning?
No, it doesn't.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http:/
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 05:23:06PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 15:53:08 +0100
> Matthew Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > That's great, thanks - all test files I have now scan OK.
> >
> > Does the above alter much else in the scanning?
>
> No, it doesn't.
Excellent, th
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:50:50AM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
> Is it the latest Sun compiler?
> Does it also crash if you don't use any optimizations? (CFLAGS only -g)
> Does it crash if you use gcc?
I have reinstalled 0.94 using gcc, the problem disappered.
I have tested both with 32 and 64-bit c
On 2008-10-17 19:54, Hans Morten Kind wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 09:50:50AM +0300, Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> Is it the latest Sun compiler?
>> Does it also crash if you don't use any optimizations? (CFLAGS only -g)
>> Does it crash if you use gcc?
>>
>
> I have reinstalled 0.94 using gc
Nigel Horne wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We are pleased to announce the availability of the first release candidate
> for ClamAV 0.94.1. 0.94.1RC1 is scheduled for release on Wednesday (15/10/08).
>
Nigel,
Everything works on gcc-3.3.6 with Redhat FC1. I managed to install
check and perform the checks
Are the following warnings anything to worry about, or is this a libmilter
issue?
clamav-milter.c: In function ‘clamfi_connect’:
clamav-milter.c:2868: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘hosts_ctl’ discards
qualifiers from pointer target type
clamav-milter.c: In function ‘clamfi_eom’:
c
On 2008-10-17 21:26, Jason Bertoch wrote:
> Are the following warnings anything to worry about, or is this a libmilter
> issue?
>
>
> clamav-milter.c: In function ‘clamfi_connect’:
> clamav-milter.c:2868: warning: passing argument 1 of ‘hosts_ctl’ discards
> qualifiers from pointer target
> Please do open a bug and attach the file that was crashing when compiled
> with the old Sun C.
Have done, however the servers runnning solaris10 were already upgraded,
so the bug reported is produced on solaris9 with an even older SUNWspro.
hmk
___
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 08:19:54AM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:41:50 -0700
> John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Do you have any thoughts about how we can get the stats to you, so that
> > you can use them, without bypassing our mechanism for ensuring
> > consistent
18 matches
Mail list logo
