On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 18:31 -0500, René Berber wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > Another downside of this approach, together with ClamAV treating mbox
> > format files as text/plain is, that only the first hit will be reported.
>
> That was made to improve performance, the Changelog say so.
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 18:31 -0500, René Berber wrote:
>> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>
>>> Another downside of this approach, together with ClamAV treating mbox
>>> format files as text/plain is, that only the first hit will be reported.
>> That was made to improve perf
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 09:15 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >>> Another downside of this approach, together with ClamAV treating mbox
> >>> format files as text/plain is, that only the first hit will be reported.
> >> That was made to improve performance, the Changelog
> > Unless you separate the mbox file(s) into maildir files and then you get
exactly what
> > you expect. It is, however, an annoying additional step one must take to
> > ensure
> > systems are as secure as possible.
>
> Of course. However, I got the impression that neither of the recent
> repo