> > (3) some config setting in clamd.conf.
> If you think (2) is just one more thing to maintain and present option
> (3) which is not external and seems to be able to do what you want,
> well... Why are you asking? ;-)
>> but, even clamav makes it available as a build option (fairly
>> recently
On 6/12/07, Jonathan Derque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> For some reasons, I'm still using clamav-0.88.7. I'd like to know if
> this version is affected by vulnerabilities #521 and #511. Since the
> unrar part of libclamav has been rewritten since then, I have
> difficulties to figur
On 6/11/07, snowcrash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> > Tcpwrappers hearkens back to a time before firewalls.
>
> true. but, even clamav makes it available as a build option (fairly
> recently added, iirc?) -- just for clamav-milter, NOT clamd ...
>
> but you're correct.
>
> > But why is you
> I guess we can agree to disagree, I would think that having one's
"firewall" spread out over
(snip)
fair enuf.
i just choose to have app scope/function defined in the app. AND, not
having a gaggle of fw configs lying around ...
my 'env' is pretty simple -- one router/fw at network edge that
Hello everyone,
When using "clamscan" to scan a specific file with a command line, I am
assuming that the name of the file alone can be the basis for a number of
positive matches for viruses, am I right? Is there a way then to use the
command line interface to scan a file (with a modified tem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
SYPECom-AV-Dev wrote:
> When using "clamscan" to scan a specific file with a command line, I am
> assuming that the name of the file alone can be the basis for a number of
> positive matches for viruses, am I right?
No.
> Is there a way then to us
> Not needed. It would be too easy for virus writers to just change the name
> and/or some property to trick defenses, so anti virus software doesn't care
> about that.
Ok, from what you are saying, ClamAV should therefore be as effective to scan a
file named 1.temp than if it were named for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
does anyone uses Sensorynetworks AcceleratorCards with ClamAV ?
(http://sensorynetworks.com/Products/Acceleration/)
I tried to Buy _ONE_ Card as evaluation sample,
but the german reseller said, that SensoryNetworks does not sell
_only one_ Card.
SYPECom-AV-Dev wrote:
>> Not needed. It would be too easy for virus writers to just change the name
>> and/or some property to trick defenses, so anti virus software doesn't care
>> about that.
>
> Ok, from what you are saying, ClamAV should therefore be as effective to scan
> a file named 1
