On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:13:54 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > No, that's a minor bug in this particular RC.
> >
> >
>
> Tomasz, are you sure this is a bug?
Yes.
> If "installing the main.cvd and daily.cvd commented out" is a bug, then
> all upgrades (including ones on
Hi,
i have two questions:
1. Is its possible to set the rights of the clamd-milter-socket? eg. 775 or
777?
If not is it possible to accept this to a feature-wishlist?
2. In clamav-partial often files remaining. Is it possible to delete these
files
automatically or should this done by a c
After installing libconv from sunfreeware its ok, but one more thing how can I
make sure that it has sucessfully installed,
following is my output
bash-2.03# freshclam -v
Current working dir is /usr/local/share/clamav
Max retries == 3
ClamAV update process started at Mon Jun 11 14:34:46 2007
Tcpwrappers hearkens back to a time before firewalls. But why is your
second option not optimal? clamd.conf is where you should tell clamd where
to provide it's service. Likewise, the OS firewall is the place where you
should tell your OS who can access your services. For example, if you're
run
On 6/11/07, Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:13:54 +0700
> "Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > No, that's a minor bug in this particular RC.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Tomasz, are you sure this is a bug?
>
> Yes.
>
> > If "installing the main.cvd and dail
hi,
> Tcpwrappers hearkens back to a time before firewalls.
true. but, even clamav makes it available as a build option (fairly
recently added, iirc?) -- just for clamav-milter, NOT clamd ...
but you're correct.
> But why is your second option not optimal?
Simply 'one more thing' to take care
> i've clamd running on a standalone box on my private LAN, listening on
> a TCP socket; in clamd.conf i have,
>
> TCPAddr 10.0.0.105
> TCPSocket 3310
>
> i'm submitting messages TO it via exim's exiscan/content-scanning.
>
> works great.
>
> i'd like to LIMIT which IPs can *access* clamd o
Dear list,
For some reasons, I'm still using clamav-0.88.7. I'd like to know if
this version is affected by vulnerabilities #521 and #511. Since the
unrar part of libclamav has been rewritten since then, I have
difficulties to figure it out. So, do you think clamav-0.88.7 is
affected by these vuln
