[Clamav-users] Long delays of 0.90.2

Hello, I've recently upgraded to clamav 0.90.2 on my linux mail server. Since then I've noticed huge hogs on CPU and long delays of clamscan processes. I made a test today to see the difference between various versions of clamav. I've compiled versions 0.90.2 0.90.1 0.88.7 all with the same opti

[Clamav-users] Clean-up e-mails wich are received after clamav-0.90.2 crash ?

Hello, I'm a newbie on Clam problems because I rarely have encounterd problems with it, but now I have a weard problem. After latest upgrade to clamav-0.90.2 clamd didn't startup. Problem was read/write permission on temporary directory /tmp what never did occur before !!! I have solved that p

Re: [Clamav-users] Long delays of 0.90.2

On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: > I've recently upgraded to clamav 0.90.2 on my linux > mail server. Since then I've noticed huge hogs on CPU > and long delays of clamscan processes. > > 0.88.7 took 2 seconds to identify the virus > 0.90.1 took 30 seconds to identify the virus > 0.

Re: [Clamav-users] Long delays of 0.90.2

On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 13:34 +0300, Kapetanakis Giannis wrote: > Now the time is gone down from 30 to 12 seconds for 0.90.2 > > Still seems long to me. use clamd/clamdscan -trog signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Re: [Clamav-users] Performance decrease with clamav-0.90.2

Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > Hello, Rob. > > >>> Try this patch: >>> http://citrin.ru/stuff/clamav/patch-0.90.1-matcher-ac.c >>> >>> Also see: >>> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=434 >>> > > >> Is this an issue if using clamdscan vs. clamscan? Is this patch >> recommended

[Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

Hi! Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, which might although have other shortcomings in terms of Mailscanner not knowing if it is running. The patch provided on the clamav-devel list seems to improve things,

Re: [Clamav-users] Terrible performance with 0.90.2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Michael Heiming wrote: | Tests show pretty bad performance with 0.90.2 and clamscan. Running | Mailscanner it seems not trivial to switch to clamd, It is trivial, just change lib/clamav-wrapper and lib/MailScanner/SweepViruses.pm; I include my chan

Re: [Clamav-users] Cannot update clamav-0.90.1.tar.gz on Mandriva2007

>> I tried to follow as many instructions from various sources before I >> made this posting however my lack of knowledge was not improved as I >> found the freshclam.conf(5) manual impossible to understand. This >> file is not written for a new person. >> >> I removed earlier versions of cla