I found a problem on one of our clamav servers - freshclam kept timing
out when updating (My fault - a firewall rule problem) For some reason
this caused the clamav milter to die which is not a huge problem as
sendmail continues to deliver mail.
The error I got was:
Mar 28 15:15:45 pdcsmtp01 send
On 28/03/2007 06:59, Hacı DAYI wrote:
You seem to have changed your name since your previous post?
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote On 03/28/2007 03:57 AM:
Gregory Carter wrote:
I would ban this user from this list as it is a Ad in disguise.
He just cross posted this same question to the iptables li
Hi, usually clamav use 100% of my cpu making the load average very hight,
latelay i have had even a big error in the log :
clamscan: corrupt or unknown ClamAV scanner error or memory/resource/perms
problem - exit status 40
i use qmail with qmail-scanner, is there a way to make clamav use less cpu
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:54:18 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi, usually clamav use 100% of my cpu making the load average very hight,
> latelay i have had even a big error in the log :
> clamscan: corrupt or unknown ClamAV scanner error or memory/resource/perms
> problem - exit status 40
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:54:18 +0200 (CEST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Hi, usually clamav use 100% of my cpu making the load average very
>> hight,
>> latelay i have had even a big error in the log :
>> clamscan: corrupt or unknown ClamAV scanner error or
>> memory/resource/perms
>> problem -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 11:54:18 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, usually clamav use 100% of my cpu making the load average very
hight,
latelay i have had even a big error in the log :
clamscan: corrupt or unknown ClamAV scanner error or
memory/resource/perms
probl
Hey all;
I'm running ClamAV 0.90.1 on FreeBSD 6.2.
In front of this server I have 3 other, which gather traffic and run it
through my ClamAV-server.
Everything is running smothly, except some mails, that are large. Right
now I have 4 mails on one of the servers that vary in size from 20MB to 60
MB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:13:11AM +0200, Greg McCarthy wrote:
>
>Now to my question :) Does anyone have a script or know how I can
>monitor the clamav milter so if it ever dies again I get an email
>alert, or the script can even restart the milter.
Greg McCarthy wrote:
I found a problem on one of our clamav servers - freshclam kept timing
out when updating (My fault - a firewall rule problem) For some reason
this caused the clamav milter to die which is not a huge problem as
sendmail continues to deliver mail.
The error I got was:
Mar 28 1
On Mar 29, 2007, at 7:03 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm running ClamAV 0.90.1 on FreeBSD 6.2.
In front of this server I have 3 other, which gather traffic and
run it
through my ClamAV-server.
Everything is running smothly, except some mails, that are large.
Right
now I have 4 mails on one
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey all;
> I'm running ClamAV 0.90.1 on FreeBSD 6.2.
> In front of this server I have 3 other, which gather traffic and run
> it through my ClamAV-server.
>
> Everything is running smothly, except some mails, that are large.
> Right now I have 4 mails on one of the serv
Per Jessen wrote:
> Virus-scanning anything bigger than 1-2Mb makes little sense. ANything
> as big as 20Mb, I would just skip without further consideration.
>
Nowadays it is not unusual to find malware samples exceeding that 2MB
size limit.
--
Regards,
Julio Canto | VirusTotal.com | Hispase
On Mar 29, 2007, at 12:03 PM, Julio Canto wrote:
Per Jessen wrote:
Virus-scanning anything bigger than 1-2Mb makes little sense.
ANything
as big as 20Mb, I would just skip without further consideration.
Nowadays it is not unusual to find malware samples exceeding that
2MB size limit.
It
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> It's certainly possible for a large Word/Excel/whatever file to be
> infected, but they aren't very common. Out of the 400+ viruses
> quarantined over the past week or so on one of my mail servers, the
> average size was 11KB, and the largest malicious email was 116KB (it
> c
I have to agree, in the technical sense that if you allow larger
attachments it really starts to sap the resources. I originally allowed
400MB attachment scanning and it would really load down the server at
times. I set it back to default setting of 10MB and resource usage was
much better. I fi
> Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > It's certainly possible for a large Word/Excel/whatever file to be
> > infected, but they aren't very common. Out of the 400+ viruses
> > quarantined over the past week or so on one of my mail servers, the
> > average size was 11KB, and the largest malicious email was
> >> Virus-scanning anything bigger than 1-2Mb makes little sense.
> >> ANything
> >> as big as 20Mb, I would just skip without further consideration.
> >
> > Nowadays it is not unusual to find malware samples exceeding that
> > 2MB size limit.
>
> It's certainly possible for a large Word/Exc
17 matches
Mail list logo
