Hi, all,
I'm using Solaris 5.8 and sendmail 8.12.11 on intel cpu. I use Clamav
from the old 0.86.x. With the 0.90 version I don't able to compile the
clamav-milter because the linker says:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
res_close
Hi, all,
I'm using Solaris 5.8 and sendmail 8.12.11 on intel cpu. I use Clamav
from the old 0.86.x. With the 0.90 version I don't able to compile the
clamav-milter because the linker says:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
res_close
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all,
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
res_close clamav-milter.o
the string of linker is:
gcc -g -O2 -o .libs/clamav-milter cfgparser.o output.o getopt.o memory.
o misc.onetwork.o
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
;
; Undefined first referenced
; symbol in file
; res_close clamav-milter.o
;
; In what library is res_close?
It should be in libresolv.so but it's a deprecated interface alth
Thanks guys for the great new release. It's working well. The change to the new
parameter style was easy and is now more logical.
The change to diffs for the daily cvd is good, but it has caused me a problem.
I used to
run a single freshclam server to download from the mirrors, and then all the
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens René Berber
> Verzonden: woensdag 14 februari 2007 7:20
> Aan: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
> Onderwerp: [Clamav-users] Perl module Mail::ClamAV not
> compatible with ver.0.90
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNE
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:52:34 +1000
"Bill Maidment" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks guys for the great new release. It's working well. The change to the
> new parameter style was easy and is now more logical.
>
> The change to diffs for the daily cvd is good, but it has caused me a
> problem.
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> Now that 0.90 is released how long will 88.7 supported? I have a lot
>> of backend stuff to rewrite and still have some DST patches to fight
>> with :)
The 0.8x serie is no longer supported, but we have provided package
maintainers with a set o
aCaB wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Now that 0.90 is released how long will 88.7 supported? I have a lot
of backend stuff to rewrite and still have some DST patches to fight
with :)
The 0.8x serie is no longer supported, but we have provided package
maintainers with a s
Rene, you solved my make problem, it works, simple symbolic link solved this
problem and I was able to compile clamav-0.90...
Hurah...
Thank you so much for your help.
Chris
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Ren? Berber wrote:
Krzys wrote:
[snip]
/usr/sfw/bin/gcc -shared -Wl,-h -Wl,libclamav.so.1 -
Greetings,
I have some problems with digital signatures with ClamAV 0.90.
I receiving message: "WARNING: ** GNU MP 2 or newer NOT FOUND - digital
signature support will be disabled!" when configuring ClamAV.
I DO have installed libgmp (gmp-4.2.1). With the previous version of clamav
(clam
I've just upgraded my version of clamav, built using the following:
./configure --enable-milter --disable-clamuko
make
make install
I then ran freshclam -v, and got the following output...
server:/usr/local/src/clamav-0.90# freshclam -v
Current working dir is /var/lib/clamav
Max retr
Dennis Peterson wrote:
> It was database and freshclam support I was thinking about. If the file
> formats and freshclam communications protocol don't change then I'll
> have time to get caught up. I have a db mirror here so that my systems
> don't beat yours to death and that's going to need some
platform: solaris 5.9, sendmail 8.13.something, gcc 3.4.3,
4-cpu sun 450 (300 MHz CPUs; it's kinda old).
clamav seems to have built and installed without issue;
nice job.
i have some random thoughts and observations and a question:
- i have not yet enabled experimental code; i'm going to let
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
George Eliozov wrote:
> I have some problems with digital signatures with ClamAV 0.90.
>
> I receiving message: "WARNING: ** GNU MP 2 or newer NOT FOUND - digital
> signature support will be disabled!" when configuring ClamAV.
Assuming you built
a followup to my last note.
using clamav-milter with --external seems to cause significant
load issues: the system load average seemed top climb without bound --
i shut things down when it hit around 40.
i shutdown clamd and clamav-milter and restarted clamav-milter
without the --external option
Thanks!!! It was very helpful! ;)
It was a stupid problem with path to libraries.
I configure ClamAV with script:
export CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib
./configure
Thanks a lot!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ren
On 2/14/07, Rick Pim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
a followup to my last note.
using clamav-milter with --external seems to cause significant
load issues: the system load average seemed top climb without bound --
i shut things down when it hit around 40.
i shutdown clamd and clamav-milter and re
I am running a linux suse 10.1 system with kernel version 2.6.16 and an error
occurs with freshclam. As first step i download,compile and install new
version of clamav 88.7, but the error is kept. The error vanished, if i use no
proxy server or an external proxy server. using wwwoffle (Version 2.8e
Hi again
I'm using clamav-0.90 with mimedefang-2.61, spamassassin-3.1.7 and
sendmail-8.14.0
I'm now getting errors as follows:
/var/spool/MIMEDefang/mdefang-l1DD1Lfh016597/Work/msg-15039-625.pdf: Zip module
failure
ERROR
This used to happen in clamav-0.88.3 Has the bug been re-introduced? Or sh
What is the current significance of the daily.inc directory? It is
present in my rc3 environment but not in 0.90.
dp
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
I had the same problem running on a Sun Fire X2200 - Solaris 10.
88.7 I have a load avg of around 0.70 with .90 this shot up to 6.0
Cpu usage also on 88.7 is around 20% during large amounts of email with
.90 this shot up to 90%.
I've gone back to 88.7 as I can't afford the performance hit.
I compar
Hi,
High CPU usage and too many open files problems here with 0.90 on
OpenBSD 3.5. Have reversed to 0.88.7.
Abdul
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
23 matches
Mail list logo
