Christopher X. Candreva ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I don't want to discuss about performance in general, I would just
like to know if this is "normal" and/or if there is a way to tune up
that process.
I use 0.88.7
Yes, it is normal for 0.88.x
The
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> > The 0.90rc2 release has greatly improved performance.
>
> OK. Could you define "greatly improved"? I'm quite happy with clamav but I use
> postfix/amavis with pre-queueing and therefore... :)
It's been a while, but things that took minutes to scan
Hello,
I'm new to clamav. I'm running exim 4.66 and clamav (ClamAV 0.88.7/2487/Wed
Jan 24 10:53:17 2007). There are two issues at hand;
1) clam is not returning the name! of virus it caught in mails. Exim
has a $malware_name variable which should have it, which is coming up as
empty in ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Haris Khan wrote:
> I'm new to clamav. I'm running exim 4.66 and clamav (ClamAV 0.88.7/2487/Wed
> Jan 24 10:53:17 2007). There are two issues at hand;
>
> 1) clam is not returning the name! of virus it caught in mails. Exim
> has a $malware_nam
