AW: [Clamav-users] Memory leak on x86_64!?

2006-12-23 Thread Stephan Brauss
> I don't know the format of a VMWare file. Is it useful to scan it (or are > the contents enough unlike what a scanner knows about that problems are > unlikely to be seen anyhow)? Perhaps it makes more sense to scan VMs from > within the VM. I do not want to scan it, but I tried out clamav, and

RE: [Clamav-users] Memory leak on x86_64!?

2006-12-23 Thread Stephan Brauss
> My experience: vmdk-file can't be properly scanned without accounting for > the vmdk base of the file. They are not files Clamav understands. Just as > zip files need special handling, vmdk files need special handling. VMware > has published the specs. I don't have the time/smarts to process

RE: [Clamav-users] Memory leak on x86_64!?

2006-12-23 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Stephan Brauss > Sent: zaterdag 23 december 2006 12:39 > To: 'ClamAV users ML' > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Memory leak on x86_64!? > > > My experience: vmdk-file can't be properly scanned without

RE: [Clamav-users] DB Update email before actual update available?

2006-12-23 Thread Mark
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Dennis Peterson > Sent: vrijdag 22 december 2006 15:15 > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] DB Update email before actual > update available? > > >> Looking at my options there... > > >

[Clamav-users] Trojan.Conka.A

2006-12-23 Thread Ben Lambrey
Hi, We received several samples of Trojan.Conka.A (name by BitDefender) Trojan.MGK (name by FRISK) at our viruswall last week. I've submitted a sample of the captured virus twice to Clamav, but is still undetected by Clamav. I wonder why? Ben. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ON1ALD) __

Re: [Clamav-users] Trojan.Conka.A

2006-12-23 Thread Steve Basford
Ben Lambrey wrote: > We received several samples of Trojan.Conka.A (name by BitDefender) > Trojan.MGK > (name by FRISK) at our viruswall last week. > I've submitted a sample of the captured virus twice to Clamav, but is still > undetected by Clamav. I wonder why? > Hi Ben, While you wait f

Re: SPAM-LOW: RE: [Clamav-users] Memory leak on x86_64!?

2006-12-23 Thread jphillip
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Stephan Brauss wrote: > > My experience: vmdk-file can't be properly scanned without accounting for > > the vmdk base of the file. They are not files Clamav understands. Just as > > zip files need special handling, vmdk files need special handling. VMware > > > has publish

RE: [Clamav-users] Memory leak on x86_64!?

2006-12-23 Thread jphillip
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006, Mark wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Stephan Brauss > > Sent: zaterdag 23 december 2006 12:39 > > To: 'ClamAV users ML' > > Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] Memory leak on x86_64!? > > > > > My expe