[Clamav-users] Re: clamav-users Digest, Vol 17, Issue 23

2006-03-01 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, I get the digests, and it looks as if messages from the users digest are getting blocked by the latest unofficial phishing signatures: == Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 17:01:05 GMT From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Clamav-users] [OT] Rbl listing

2006-03-01 Thread Matt Fretwell
Just as a point of possible interest, whilst testing the MSRBL list that someone mentioned the other day, noticed this: http://www.msrbl.com/site/check?ip=64.18.103.6 Might be worthwhile one of the list admins contacting the rbl admins to point out that listing a virus scanner mailing list for

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Rbl listing

2006-03-01 Thread Mar Matthias Darin
Hello, Matt Fretwell writes: Good job I was just testing this rbl with a warn status on the mailserver :) I 've found using a warn for RBLs to be the best approach. As to the unofficial sigs I'm hold off until more testings is done. I have to question the integrity of using them in

Re: [Clamav-users] [OT] Rbl listing

2006-03-01 Thread Maurice Lucas
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 23:01 -0600, Mar Matthias Darin wrote: > Hello, > > Matt Fretwell writes: > > > Good job I was just testing this rbl with a warn status on the > > mailserver :) > > I 've found using a warn for RBLs to be the best approach. As to the > unofficial sigs I'm hold off