Mandi! Bob Hutchinson
In chel di` si favelave...
> try
> --exclude-dir=quarantena
> as it is a pattern, not a path, might work ;-)
Ok, works. But as i've stated yesterday, if some user create a
``quarantena'' folder somewhere, that folder are not scanned. This is
not so good...
There's some way
Mandi! Nicolas MacPherson
In chel di` si favelave...
> I don't understand how to work around this issue. When these start
You have restarted clamd? Some month ago (not 0.88 version) i've found
clamd ``stalled'', like this.
--
dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Nicolas MacPherson wrote:
Hello,
Just out of curiosity, is there a way to run clamd on a dedicated
server, so that clamdscan could process the messages on the remote
machine? I'm curious because I work for an ISP that currently runs a
dedicated Spamassassin server
Hello,
Nope... I have recompiled and tweaked the conf file as much as I
can, the load on the server seems to be too much. My mail server is
running on a Sun Enterprise 450 with 4x400Mhz Ultrasparc 2 & 2GB Ram,
and I think the incoming SMTP traffic is just too much. The clamd
process take
Nigel Horne wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Nicolas MacPherson wrote:
Hello,
Just out of curiosity, is there a way to run clamd on a dedicated
server, so that clamdscan could process the messages on the remote
machine? I'm curious because I work for an ISP that currently runs a
dedicate
I'm seeing the freshclam warning here for about a day now, so something
somewhere appears to be at fault with the DNS record.
Anyone have any news about this? I don't think it's at my end as all
other DNS activity is normal.
--
Brian Morrison
bdm at fenrir dot org dot uk
GnuPG key ID DE32E5C5
Brian Morrison wrote:
I'm seeing the freshclam warning here for about a day now, so something
somewhere appears to be at fault with the DNS record.
Anyone have any news about this? I don't think it's at my end as all
other DNS activity is normal.
Hi,
I only see that when the clock on the ser
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Nicolas MacPherson wrote:
Hello,
Just out of curiosity, is there a way to run clamd on a
dedicated server, so that clamdscan could process the messages on
the remote machine? I'm curious because I work for an ISP that
c
Hi there --
I mounted an NFS directory that has a newer version of gcc/ I then mounted tthe
following lines to my .cshrc file:
setenv GCC_PATH /usr/tools/gcc3
setenv PATH ${GCC_PATH}/bin:${PATH}
setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH ${GCC_PATH}/lib
alias gcc /usr/tools/gcc3/
After the change
Unless you know what version of HP-UX that version of gcc 3 was built
on, I wouldn't trust that it will run on your 10.20 machine. If the
compiler you are trying to use was built on 11.0 or later, don't count
on it working at all.
You know how old HP-UX 10.20 is, right? HP has not supported 10.20
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
> I mounted an NFS directory that has a newer version of gcc/ I then mounted
> tthe
> following lines to my .cshrc file:
>
> setenv GCC_PATH /usr/tools/gcc3
> setenv PATH ${GCC_PATH}/bin:${PATH}
This far is OK.
> setenv
On 2/7/06, René Berber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But first correct the part with LD_LIBRARY_PATH above.
René is right. I missed that. On 10.20, LD_LIBRARY_PATH is not what
you want. SHLIB_PATH is the environment variable. That still assumes
the binary was linked to allow searches for the shared
I made the changes you had suggested to the .cshrc file.
> setenv LD_LIBRARY_PATH ${GCC_PATH}/lib
> This won't work, get rid of it.
I commented out that line.
> alias gcc /usr/tools/gcc3/
> What's this for? Don't use this, first check if changing your path gives you
the new gcc: `
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
> I made the changes you had suggested to the .cshrc file.
[snip]
> I commented out that line as well, ran source .cshrc and then ran which gcc
> and
> gcc --version. The which gcc command gave me
>
> the following output: g
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:13 -0500, Nicolas MacPherson wrote:
> I want to thank everyone for all the input so far, currently I am
> calling clamdscan through simscan on a QMail box running vpopmail. In
> order to call the clamav-milter, would I just change the configure
> options for simscan to
Hello,
I'm constructing a SPAM / AV mechanism to reduce the incoming debris.
I'm using Postfix with amavisd-new, Clam-AV and SpamAssassin.
What is the easiest way to setup a whitelist for Clam-AV?
A.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.h
> Perhaps setting the header path explicitly, as in:
> CFLAGS="-I/usr/include" ./configure ...
I don't know into which file the CFLAGS line goes, or if it gets executed from
the command prompt.
When I ran the make script as a regular user, I got an error 1 message due to a
permission deni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
>>Perhaps setting the header path explicitly, as in:
>>CFLAGS="-I/usr/include" ./configure ...
>
> I don't know into which file the CFLAGS line goes, or if it gets executed from
> the command prompt.
No file, the above is th
> No file, the above is the command typed on a terminal to configure the
package.
> It may be different under csh, but you can use 'setenv CFLAGS
"-I/usr/include"'
> before running ./configure
I ran the command setenv CFLAGS "-I/usr/include" as a regular user and it seemed
to accept the comma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
[snip]
> I removed the SHLIB_PATH command from the .cshrc file, and tried the procedure
> again, without success...I am at a loss here.
Same message about h_errno?
- --
René Berber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
> Same message about h_errno?
Yes -- the message is the same.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kaplan, Andrew H. wrote:
>>Same message about h_errno?
>
> Yes -- the message is the same.
OK, let's analyze the output of running configure.
There are 3 tests inside configure that use netdb.h and h_errno, they seem to be
testing to see what varia
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:05 -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
> > I'm seeing the freshclam warning here for about a day now, so something
> > somewhere appears to be at fault with the DNS record.
> >
> > Anyone have any news about this? I don't think it's at my end as all
> > o
I've been seeing this on a lot of servers as well but the time/date on
the servers are correct. Many of them are even timing out trying to grab
the dns record occasionally. Anyone else seeing this?
Here too, and server time is correct though the log entries seem to
point to DNS issues.
Im
At 08:39 PM 2/7/2006, steven collins wrote:
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 12:05 -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> Brian Morrison wrote:
> > I'm seeing the freshclam warning here for about a day
now, so something
> > somewhere appears to be at fault with the DNS record.
> >
> > Anyone have any news about
25 matches
Mail list logo
