I hate to crosspost, but since it appears no one reads the Win32 list, I
switched my subscription to the main users list.
I've got ClamAV working and that is all good and fine. However, I
looked in the archives of the clamav-users list and saw that still as of
June 2005, ClamAV is completely
On Sep 11, 2005, at 10:07 PM, Thomas Hruska wrote:
I hate to crosspost, but since it appears no one reads the Win32
list, I switched my subscription to the main users list.
I've got ClamAV working and that is all good and fine. However, I
looked in the archives of the clamav-users list an
Thomas Hruska said:
> I hate to crosspost, but since it appears no one reads the Win32 list, I
> switched my subscription to the main users list.
Everything you require can be found at Google. As you observed, ClamAV is
not in the spyware detection business.
dp
___
Dale Walsh wrote:
What your asking for sounds simple however, how do you establish
detection??
Can't you use the existing signature scanning technology in ClamAV to
identify known spyware vendors? Spyware vendors distribute either
embedded libraries or have specific DLLs or EXEs - something
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Thomas Hruska said:
I hate to crosspost, but since it appears no one reads the Win32 list, I
switched my subscription to the main users list.
Everything you require can be found at Google. As you observed, ClamAV is
not in the spyware detection business.
dp
No it ca
Thomas Hruska said:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>> Thomas Hruska said:
>>
>>>I hate to crosspost, but since it appears no one reads the Win32 list, I
>>>switched my subscription to the main users list.
>>
>>
>> Everything you require can be found at Google. As you observed, ClamAV
>> is
>> not in the
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Thomas Hruska said:
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Thomas Hruska said:
I hate to crosspost, but since it appears no one reads the Win32 list, I
switched my subscription to the main users list.
Everything you require can be found at Google. As you observed, ClamAV
is
not i
Thomas Hruska said:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> Thank you but I already know the tool doesn't exist or I wouldn't be
> wandering around this forum. Since the tool doesn't exist, I found the
> _closest_ possible tool to the tool I am looking for and ClamAV happens
> to be that tool. You should b
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Meanwhile, why don't you create signatures for known spyware and place
them in your configuration? ClamAV allows this, you know. If you get good
at it you can share them.
dp
Actually I didn't know that. I was under the impression that it was
completely central database
On Friday 09 September 2005 12:10, Chantal Rosmuller wrote:
> configure
--disable-zlib-vcheck
--
Regards,
Sergey
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
On Monday 12 September 2005 09:49, Sergey wrote:
> > configure
>
> --disable-zlib-vcheck
Sorry, I have not read up the message up to the end :-(
--
Regards,
Sergey
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
11 matches
Mail list logo
