[Clamav-users] Virus Found by DansGuardian Anti-Virus - False Positive??

2005-06-05 Thread Odhiambo Washington
Hello users, On my home network, all http traffic is transparently passed through DansGuardian, which uses clamd to scan any downloads for viruses. I am running ClamAv CVS on the home router, which is just a FreeBSD box giving "controlled" access to all the services my neighbours would ever want t

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus Found by DansGuardian Anti-Virus - False Positive??

2005-06-05 Thread Securiteinfo.com
Hello, Le dimanche 5 Juin 2005 14:33, Odhiambo Washington a écrit : > Hello users, > > On my home network, all http traffic is transparently passed through > DansGuardian, which uses clamd to scan any downloads for viruses. > I am running ClamAv CVS on the home router, which is just a FreeBSD > bo

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus Found by DansGuardian Anti-Virus - False Positive??

2005-06-05 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Securiteinfo.com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050605 15:53]: wrote: > Hello, > > Le dimanche 5 Juin 2005 14:33, Odhiambo Washington a écrit : > > Hello users, > > > > On my home network, all http traffic is transparently passed through > > DansGuardian, whi

Re: [Clamav-users] Virus Found by DansGuardian Anti-Virus - False Positive??

2005-06-05 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:33:24 +0300 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello users, > > On my home network, all http traffic is transparently passed through > DansGuardian, which uses clamd to scan any downloads for viruses. > I am running ClamAv CVS on the home router, which is just

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Niek
On 6/5/2005 5:22 AM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote: I am just wondering how feasible it is to do AV hw acceleration in general. Besides using faster CPU and faster memory, ASIC can't really help. Can anybody shed some light ? You answered your own question. Now I'm awaiting a similar question on the

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Joanna Roman
--- Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/5/2005 5:22 AM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote: > > I am just wondering how feasible it is to do AV hw > > acceleration in general. Besides using faster CPU > and > > faster memory, ASIC can't really help. Can anybody > > shed some light ? > You answered your

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Damian Menscher
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Joanna Roman wrote: --- Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/5/2005 5:22 AM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote: I am just wondering how feasible it is to do AV hw acceleration in general. Besides using faster CPU and faster memory, ASIC can't really help. Can anybody shed some light

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Securiteinfo.com
Le dimanche 5 Juin 2005 22:15, Joanna Roman a écrit : > --- Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 6/5/2005 5:22 AM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote: > > > I am just wondering how feasible it is to do AV hw > > > acceleration in general. Besides using faster CPU > > > > and > > > > > faster memory, ASIC c

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Joanna Roman
--- Damian Menscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Joanna Roman wrote: > > --- Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On 6/5/2005 5:22 AM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote: > >>> I am just wondering how feasible it is to do AV > hw acceleration in > >>> general. Besides using faster CPU

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Joanna Roman
--- "Securiteinfo.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le dimanche 5 Juin 2005 22:15, Joanna Roman a > écrit : > > --- Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 6/5/2005 5:22 AM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote: > > > > I am just wondering how feasible it is to do > AV hw > > > > acceleration in general. B

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Timo Schoeler
Joanna Roman schrieb: > > --- Damian Menscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Joanna Roman wrote: >> >>>--- Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 6/5/2005 5:22 AM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote: >I am just wondering how feasible it is to do AV >> >>hw acceleration i

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Joanna Roman spake: > > --- "Securiteinfo.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >>Le dimanche 5 Juin 2005 22:15, Joanna Roman a >>écrit : >> >>>--- Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 6/5/2005 5:22 AM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote: >I am just wondering how feasible it is to do >

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Securiteinfo.com
Le dimanche 5 Juin 2005 23:20, Joanna Roman a écrit : > --- "Securiteinfo.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > Le dimanche 5 Juin 2005 22:15, Joanna Roman a > > > > écrit : > > > --- Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 6/5/2005 5:22 AM +0200, Joanna Roman wrote: > > > > > I am just wonder

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Elliot Mackenzie
Of course it can, for example by using a single process environment, with synchronous CPU/fast RAM to maximize banwidth, and hardware related signature matching. It's the same for 3D video cards : floating point calculations for 3D rendering can be made by the CPU. But with dedicated hardware

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV HW acceleration

2005-06-05 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Elliot Mackenzie spake: > > >> Of course it can, for example by using a single process environment, >> with synchronous CPU/fast RAM to maximize banwidth, and hardware >> related signature matching. >> It's the same for 3D video cards : floating point calculations for 3D >> rendering can be

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter and netzero

2005-06-05 Thread .rp
On 31 May 2005 at 14:14, Damian Menscher wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2005, .rp wrote: > > > When using the -L option, all email from netzero was getting > > trapped. Is the bug in clamav-milter or netzero's email server? > > ClamAV has no bugs, so it must be netzero's fault. ;) > > Seriously, can

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter and netzero

2005-06-05 Thread Damian Menscher
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, .rp wrote: On 31 May 2005 at 14:14, Damian Menscher wrote: On Tue, 31 May 2005, .rp wrote: When using the -L option, all email from netzero was getting trapped. Is the bug in clamav-milter or netzero's email server? ClamAV has no bugs, so it must be netzero's fault. ;)

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter -> Signature file sometime notattach??? Why???

2005-06-05 Thread bonar
Did anybody know's about this issue? I've discover the msg status. It will appear if the mail is plain text and without any attachment. If do, it will hide. I I want to see it, I must go to the message source. It will be there. How do I append this signature to all message type (plain/html). Than