On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 15:29 +1000, Yuri Nosyrev wrote:
> Look at clamd.txt (attachment) for clamd startup log (clamd is running
> under djb's daemontools) with debug option turned on - it seems to be
> clean, but while trying to run clamdscan clamd's log shows:
>
> 2005-04-25 14:27:33.564011500
On Monday 25 Apr 2005 07:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a local http server on my fedora core 1, I have been using ClamAV
> with DansGuardian, Clamuko, clamav-milter at that server.
> can I make it to be an online clam av scanner for my local client ?
By "online" do you mean "web based" tha
On Monday 25 Apr 2005 02:04, Mr Prince Simon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a simple question and maybe someone can explain
> to me what happend.
>
> I have a perl script
> ---
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> print "Content-type: text/html\n\n";
> my $hashcommand ="clamscan -r -i -l
> /home/clamav/scan.txt /www
I see many are using clamav-milter. Whar is the diffrence in this approach?
/jon
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
> I see many are using clamav-milter. Whar is the diffrence in this approach?
milter is the sendmail filtering interface. clamav-milter is the way
to use clamav using this interface.
--
Erwan David
==
Trusted L
Hi, ok.
Do you consider it better than using procmail and spamassassin?
/jon
Erwan David said the following on 2005-04-25 11:44:
Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
I see many are using clamav-milter. Whar is the diffrence in this approach?
milter is the sendmail filtering interface. clamav-milte
Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
> Hi, ok.
>
> Do you consider it better than using procmail and spamassassin?
I do not know. I use postfix and clamsmtp. The problem with procmail
is that it works at delivery level and may have lost some envelope
information.
Spamassassin is anti-spam and can be us
ok, thanks.
Erwan David wrote:
Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
Hi, ok.
Do you consider it better than using procmail and spamassassin?
I do not know. I use postfix and clamsmtp. The problem with procmail
is that it works at delivery level and may have lost some envelope
information.
Spamassas
Hi,
Does clamAV by default serach through attachments? I have read somewhere
that it does but not .zip .rar or exe if no add-ons are installed. Is
this correct? Im using it with Procmail an Clamassassin.
/jon
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 13:53 +0200, Jon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does clamAV by default serach through attachments?
yes. In recent versions of code the --mbox flag has become default, and
you really have to try hard to remove ScanMail from clamd
> I have read somewhere
> that it does but not .zip
Suppo
On 2005-04-25 13:22:07 +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> Le Mon 25/04/2005, Jon disait
> > Do you consider it better than using procmail and spamassassin?
>
> I do not know. I use postfix and clamsmtp. The problem with procmail
> is that it works at delivery level and may have lost some envelope
> infor
I use Spamassassin+procmail+clamav-milter. This way procmail calls spamd to
filter out spam and clamav-milter filters mail for virii via clamd. :)
--
<>
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Thanks for extesive answer!
Do you know a good way of testing it live. Can you sent the testfile
that is included in the dist. by mail?
/jon
Daniel J McDonald said the following on 2005-04-25 14:50:
On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 13:53 +0200, Jon wrote:
Hi,
Does clamAV by default serach through attachm
On Monday 25 Apr 2005 15:19, Jon wrote:
> Do you know a good way of testing it live. Can you sent the testfile
> that is included in the dist. by mail?
http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
> /jon
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Thanks for the reply.
How do I know where the binary files are located?
also I did chmod the perl script to 755.
also when I change the command to 'ls -l',
I did see the files on the dir.
--- Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mr Prince Simon said:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a simple qu
Yes, can you please give me the sample of that perl ?
Thank you very much.
Christopher
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:26:03 +0100
From: Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] ONLINE VIRUS SCANNER
To: ClamAV users ML
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text
16 matches
Mail list logo
