Re: [Clamav-users] Performance Help - 100% cpu usage

2004-10-28 Thread Trog
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 00:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Joe Maimon wrote: > > > The ClamAV authors could put a stop to this by making clamdscan and > > > clamscan the same program and then acting differently depending on > > > which name is run. This is similiar to how gzip

[Clamav-users] 0.80 lots of warnings in quiet mode

2004-10-28 Thread Xavier Poinsard
I am running clamscan in quiet mode, but since the upgrade to 0.80, I have a lots of warnings. Here are some samples : LibClamAV Warning: Unknown encoding type "US-ASCII" - report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] LibClamAV Warning: messageFindArgument: no '=' sign found in MIME header LibClamAV Warning: Unk

Re: [Clamav-users] Problem compiling clamav-0.80

2004-10-28 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 28 Oct 2004 07:25, Ajaya Sharma wrote: > Undefined first referenced > symbol in file > __eprintf strrcpy.lo I don't have a machine that reproduces this error, so I can't say for sure, however I believe that t

[Clamav-users] ClamAV with Amavis

2004-10-28 Thread Roel Bindels
Hello Listers, I'm having problems installing the ClamAV with amavis. I'm using the old amavis(20020531), not the amavis-new or -new generation. My mailserver is running perfectly so I was not planning on making an update, till our ISP closes our line because we were sending virussus. (This was be

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV with Amavis

2004-10-28 Thread Rob MacGregor
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:58:27 +0200, Roel Bindels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I hope that somebody can help using/installing ClamAV. I googled around and > they are all talking about the other versions, so I hope you're not all > going to give me the advice "install the new version". Well, unless

Re: [Clamav-users] Performance Help - 100% cpu usage

2004-10-28 Thread clamav
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Trog wrote: > > Any thoughts on how this should be accomplished? > > I may have missed it, but what are the details of your system, OS, etc. > > And, importantly, what exact version of libz (zlib) do you have > installed? Not really applicable, I'm not having stability issue

Re: [Clamav-users] SomeFool.P in .doc file?

2004-10-28 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote: > We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file > from Outlook Express. > > Message was rejected by Exiscan with ClamAV 0.80: > Wed Oct 27 10:56:19 2004 -> > /var/spool/exim/scan/1CMjao-0004ts-Qg/1CMjao-0004ts-Qg.

Re: [Clamav-users] SomeFool.P in .doc file?

2004-10-28 Thread Trog
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:32, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote: > > We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file > > from Outlook Express. > > > > Message was rejected by Exiscan with ClamAV 0.80: > > Wed Oct 27 10:56:19 200

[Clamav-users] Switching off default config options

2004-10-28 Thread Roger North-Row
clamav-0.80 (from port) on FreeBSD 4.8 Hi, Does anyone know how to switch off the default-enabled options in clamd.conf? # Perform HTML normalisation and decryption of MS Script Encoder code. # Default: enabled #ScanHTML This should switch of HTML scanning, but from my clamd.log ... Thu Oct 28

Re: [Clamav-users] Switching off default config options

2004-10-28 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 at 12:40:09 +0100, Roger North-Row wrote: > clamav-0.80 (from port) on FreeBSD 4.8 > > Hi, > > Does anyone know how to switch off the default-enabled options in > clamd.conf? > > # Perform HTML normalisation and decryption of MS Script Encoder code. > # Default: enabled > #Sc

Re: [Clamav-users] Switching off default config options

2004-10-28 Thread Roger North-Row
Thank you. I /did/ read the clamd.conf man page, but I've not come across this type of 'overall' switch in a config file and so wasn't expecting it. I apologise for not looking hard enough. On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:51, Tomasz Papszun wrote: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 at 12:40:09 +0100, Roger North-Row

Re: [Clamav-users] Switching off default config options

2004-10-28 Thread Bret
Don't apologize, that is why these lists exist - right? Roger North-Row wrote: Thank you. I /did/ read the clamd.conf man page, but I've not come across this type of 'overall' switch in a config file and so wasn't expecting it. I apologise for not looking hard enough. On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:51, T

Re: [Clamav-users] cron that restarts clamd

2004-10-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 08:00 pm, mike.sanchez wrote: > On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Joe Maimon wrote: > > > The ClamAV authors could put a stop to this by making clamdscan and > > > clamscan the same program and then acting differently depending on > > > which name is run. This is similiar to how gz

[Clamav-users] thank you

2004-10-28 Thread Mike Lambert
Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release. ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory efficient clamd yet. *applause* Regards, Mike Lambert ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-user

Re: [Clamav-users] thank you

2004-10-28 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:33:32 -0400 (EDT) Mike Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release. > > ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory > efficient clamd yet. > > *applause* Thank you! :-) -- oo.

Re: [Clamav-users] thank you

2004-10-28 Thread Vernon A. Fort
Mike Lambert wrote: Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release. ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory efficient clamd yet. *applause* Regards, Mike Lambert ___ I concur!! I did have problem with kee

RE: [Clamav-users] thank you

2004-10-28 Thread Jason Frisvold
> -Original Message- > From: Vernon A. Fort [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] thank you > > > I concur!! I did have problem with keeping freshclam and > clamd running > on previous version but with the release of .80, all process have > continue to run flawlessl

Re: [Clamav-users] SomeFool.P in .doc file?

2004-10-28 Thread Jacek Politowski
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 12:36:06PM +0100, Trog wrote: >On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:32, Tomasz Papszun wrote: >> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote: >>> We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file >>> from Outlook Express. [...] >>> Unfortunately I can

Re: [Clamav-users] thank you

2004-10-28 Thread Scott Ryan
On Thursday 28 October 2004 16:33, Mike Lambert shaped the electrons to say: > Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release. > ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory efficient > clamd yet. > > *applause* > I will second that... if any of you are ever

Re: [Clamav-users] thank you

2004-10-28 Thread Jeff Smelser
On Thursday 28 October 2004 10:55 am, Scott Ryan wrote: > I will second that... if any of you are ever in South Africa, beers are on > me. No need my friend.. Its a new world these days.. http://www.sendafriendabeer.com/ ;) Jeff pgp0WdsS5yxUx.pgp Description: PGP signature __

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan Runaway Number of Processes

2004-10-28 Thread Todd Lyons
Odhiambo Washington wanted us to know: >Hey Todd, >How does one determine the correct number of threads to use in >clamd.conf? >Answering this question conclusively will help many folks. I really don't have an answer for this one. I ran it at 20 for a long time and just recently moved it up to 4

Re: [Clamav-users] cron that restarts clamd

2004-10-28 Thread Todd Lyons
mike.sanchez wanted us to know: >>An action could then be taken to >>alert someone if clamd died (|sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]). When clamd >>hangs on our system, mail is deferred until I realize mail has stopped and >as you can imagine, that is a bad thing. >I run a cron once an hour that runs

Re: [Clamav-users] cron that restarts clamd

2004-10-28 Thread Jason Haar
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:17:22AM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote: > as you can imagine, that's orders of magnitude more complicated than running > the two under daemontools or runit (both do essentially the same thing) > > http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html > http://smarden.org/runit/ They don't hel

[Clamav-users] cygwin clamscan hangs

2004-10-28 Thread David Nicol
I decided to test cygwin clamscan and it hung after a few hundred files Going to see if winclam has the same difficulties -- David L Nicol transportation infrastructure technology contracting since 2002 ___ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/list

[Clamav-users] why clamav was appearing to hang

2004-10-28 Thread David Nicol
it was scanning a 1 gigabyte file system image, which took several minutes. I would not have gotten worried about it if the file name appeared on its own before the "OK" -- possibly with some size information -- in the output. -- David L Nicol transportation infrastructure technology contracting

[Clamav-users] clamd performance on Solaris vs Linux

2004-10-28 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
I have several mail relays on Sun Sparcs with Solaris 8 and 9 running exim, exiscan, and clamav. All the same version. top shows clamd uses 5%-40% CPU time (it was always among top 10 highest CPU users). I figured "hey, since this is a busy server then this load is normal". A rather interesting fac

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd performance on Solaris vs Linux

2004-10-28 Thread James Lick
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: I have several mail relays on Sun Sparcs with Solaris 8 and 9 running exim, exiscan, and clamav. All the same version. top shows clamd uses 5%-40% CPU time (it was always among top 10 highest CPU users). I use clamd on a Solaris 9 sparc system and it hardly ever climbs abov

Re: [Clamav-users] why clamav was appearing to hang

2004-10-28 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Thursday 28 October 2004 09:10 pm, David Nicol wrote: > it was scanning a 1 gigabyte file system image, which took several > minutes. > > I would not have gotten worried about it if the file name appeared on > its own before the "OK" -- possibly with some size information -- in the > output. ok

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd performance on Solaris vs Linux

2004-10-28 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
James Lick wrote: Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: I have several mail relays on Sun Sparcs with Solaris 8 and 9 running exim, exiscan, and clamav. All the same version. top shows clamd uses 5%-40% CPU time (it was always among top 10 highest CPU users). I use clamd on a Solaris 9 sparc system and it hardl

[Clamav-users] cl_retver: referenced symbol not found

2004-10-28 Thread Alton Yu
Anyone run into this on Solaris? Thanks! bash-2.05# freshclam ClamAV update process started at Thu Oct 28 23:26:13 2004 ld.so.1: freshclam: fatal: relocation error: file freshclam: symbol cl_retver: referenced symbol not found Killed bash-2.05# clamd ERROR: Database initialization error. This is

Re: [Clamav-users] cl_retver: referenced symbol not found

2004-10-28 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
Alton Yu wrote: Anyone run into this on Solaris? Thanks! No :) bash-2.05# freshclam ClamAV update process started at Thu Oct 28 23:26:13 2004 ld.so.1: freshclam: fatal: relocation error: file freshclam: symbol cl_retver: referenced symbol not found Killed How DID you end up with this (compile fro