On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 00:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Joe Maimon wrote:
> > > The ClamAV authors could put a stop to this by making clamdscan and
> > > clamscan the same program and then acting differently depending on
> > > which name is run. This is similiar to how gzip
I am running clamscan in quiet mode, but since the upgrade to 0.80, I
have a lots of warnings. Here are some samples :
LibClamAV Warning: Unknown encoding type "US-ASCII" - report to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
LibClamAV Warning: messageFindArgument: no '=' sign found in MIME header
LibClamAV Warning: Unk
On Thursday 28 Oct 2004 07:25, Ajaya Sharma wrote:
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> __eprintf strrcpy.lo
I don't have a machine that reproduces this error, so I can't say for
sure, however I believe that t
Hello Listers,
I'm having problems installing the ClamAV with amavis. I'm using the old
amavis(20020531), not the amavis-new or -new generation. My mailserver is
running perfectly so I was not planning on making an update, till our ISP
closes our line because we were sending virussus. (This was be
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:58:27 +0200, Roel Bindels
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope that somebody can help using/installing ClamAV. I googled around and
> they are all talking about the other versions, so I hope you're not all
> going to give me the advice "install the new version".
Well, unless
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Trog wrote:
> > Any thoughts on how this should be accomplished?
>
> I may have missed it, but what are the details of your system, OS, etc.
>
> And, importantly, what exact version of libz (zlib) do you have
> installed?
Not really applicable, I'm not having stability issue
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
> We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file
> from Outlook Express.
>
> Message was rejected by Exiscan with ClamAV 0.80:
> Wed Oct 27 10:56:19 2004 ->
> /var/spool/exim/scan/1CMjao-0004ts-Qg/1CMjao-0004ts-Qg.
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:32, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
> > We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file
> > from Outlook Express.
> >
> > Message was rejected by Exiscan with ClamAV 0.80:
> > Wed Oct 27 10:56:19 200
clamav-0.80 (from port) on FreeBSD 4.8
Hi,
Does anyone know how to switch off the default-enabled options in
clamd.conf?
# Perform HTML normalisation and decryption of MS Script Encoder code.
# Default: enabled
#ScanHTML
This should switch of HTML scanning, but from my clamd.log ...
Thu Oct 28
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 at 12:40:09 +0100, Roger North-Row wrote:
> clamav-0.80 (from port) on FreeBSD 4.8
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know how to switch off the default-enabled options in
> clamd.conf?
>
> # Perform HTML normalisation and decryption of MS Script Encoder code.
> # Default: enabled
> #Sc
Thank you. I /did/ read the clamd.conf man page, but I've not come
across this type of 'overall' switch in a config file and so wasn't
expecting it. I apologise for not looking hard enough.
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:51, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 at 12:40:09 +0100, Roger North-Row
Don't apologize, that is why these lists exist - right?
Roger North-Row wrote:
Thank you. I /did/ read the clamd.conf man page, but I've not come
across this type of 'overall' switch in a config file and so wasn't
expecting it. I apologise for not looking hard enough.
On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:51, T
On Wednesday 27 October 2004 08:00 pm, mike.sanchez wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Joe Maimon wrote:
> > > The ClamAV authors could put a stop to this by making clamdscan and
> > > clamscan the same program and then acting differently depending on
> > > which name is run. This is similiar to how gz
Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release.
ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory efficient
clamd yet.
*applause*
Regards,
Mike Lambert
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-user
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:33:32 -0400 (EDT)
Mike Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release.
>
> ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory
> efficient clamd yet.
>
> *applause*
Thank you! :-)
--
oo.
Mike Lambert wrote:
Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release.
ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory
efficient clamd yet.
*applause*
Regards,
Mike Lambert
___
I concur!! I did have problem with kee
> -Original Message-
> From: Vernon A. Fort [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] thank you
>
>
> I concur!! I did have problem with keeping freshclam and
> clamd running
> on previous version but with the release of .80, all process have
> continue to run flawlessl
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 12:36:06PM +0100, Trog wrote:
>On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:32, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
>> On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 at 19:14:04 +0200, Jacek Politowski wrote:
>>> We have one client, who was trying to send some MS Word (doc) file
>>> from Outlook Express.
[...]
>>> Unfortunately I can
On Thursday 28 October 2004 16:33, Mike Lambert shaped the electrons to say:
> Thank you, team ClamAV, for your your hard work on the latest release.
> ClamAV 0.80 (FreeBSD 4.9) is by far the most stable and memory efficient
> clamd yet.
>
> *applause*
>
I will second that... if any of you are ever
On Thursday 28 October 2004 10:55 am, Scott Ryan wrote:
> I will second that... if any of you are ever in South Africa, beers are on
> me.
No need my friend.. Its a new world these days..
http://www.sendafriendabeer.com/
;)
Jeff
pgp0WdsS5yxUx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
__
Odhiambo Washington wanted us to know:
>Hey Todd,
>How does one determine the correct number of threads to use in
>clamd.conf?
>Answering this question conclusively will help many folks.
I really don't have an answer for this one. I ran it at 20 for a long
time and just recently moved it up to 4
mike.sanchez wanted us to know:
>>An action could then be taken to
>>alert someone if clamd died (|sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]). When clamd
>>hangs on our system, mail is deferred until I realize mail has stopped and
>as you can imagine, that is a bad thing.
>I run a cron once an hour that runs
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:17:22AM -0500, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> as you can imagine, that's orders of magnitude more complicated than running
> the two under daemontools or runit (both do essentially the same thing)
>
> http://cr.yp.to/daemontools.html
> http://smarden.org/runit/
They don't hel
I decided to test cygwin clamscan and it hung after a few hundred files
Going to see if winclam has the same difficulties
--
David L Nicol
transportation infrastructure technology contracting since 2002
___
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/list
it was scanning a 1 gigabyte file system image, which took several
minutes.
I would not have gotten worried about it if the file name appeared on
its own before the "OK" -- possibly with some size information -- in the
output.
--
David L Nicol
transportation infrastructure technology contracting
I have several mail relays on Sun Sparcs with Solaris 8 and 9
running exim, exiscan, and clamav. All the same version.
top shows clamd uses 5%-40% CPU time (it was always
among top 10 highest CPU users). I figured
"hey, since this is a busy server then this load is normal".
A rather interesting fac
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
I have several mail relays on Sun Sparcs with Solaris 8 and 9
running exim, exiscan, and clamav. All the same version.
top shows clamd uses 5%-40% CPU time (it was always
among top 10 highest CPU users).
I use clamd on a Solaris 9 sparc system and it hardly ever climbs abov
On Thursday 28 October 2004 09:10 pm, David Nicol wrote:
> it was scanning a 1 gigabyte file system image, which took several
> minutes.
>
> I would not have gotten worried about it if the file name appeared on
> its own before the "OK" -- possibly with some size information -- in the
> output.
ok
James Lick wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
I have several mail relays on Sun Sparcs with Solaris 8 and 9
running exim, exiscan, and clamav. All the same version.
top shows clamd uses 5%-40% CPU time (it was always
among top 10 highest CPU users).
I use clamd on a Solaris 9 sparc system and it hardl
Anyone run into this on Solaris? Thanks!
bash-2.05# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Thu Oct 28 23:26:13 2004
ld.so.1: freshclam: fatal: relocation error: file freshclam: symbol
cl_retver: referenced symbol not found
Killed
bash-2.05# clamd
ERROR: Database initialization error.
This is
Alton Yu wrote:
Anyone run into this on Solaris? Thanks!
No :)
bash-2.05# freshclam
ClamAV update process started at Thu Oct 28 23:26:13 2004
ld.so.1: freshclam: fatal: relocation error: file freshclam: symbol
cl_retver: referenced symbol not found
Killed
How DID you end up with this (compile fro
31 matches
Mail list logo