Paul Geldart wrote:
Hi, I finally tracked my problem down to a change in clamd/others.c, a line has
been added to undefine HAVE_POLL with the comment "temporarily disabled" and the
return value has been changed in the code block that can now never be called.
This appears to make clamd think th
While this is good, it doesn't address the issue with the '-devel'
While reading deep into the source files and readme's, I came across
some information that had me examining the build process.
If a basic './configure' or './configure --prefix=/usr
--mandir=/usr/share/man --sysconfdir=/etc' is i
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:00:10 +0100
Kevin Spicer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following message seems to be the cause of one of the most
> frequently asked questions around here...
>
> "SECURITY WARNING: NO SUPPORT FOR DIGITAL SIGNATURES"
>
> May I suggest that as this is in the FAQ that any
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
RuppSent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:40 AMTo: ClamAV users
MLSubject: Re: [Clamav-users] 0.75.1->80rc3 rpm
failure??
Cory Megitt [ClamAV] wrote:
Hi All;
I attempted to upgrade from 0.75.1 to 80rc3 via rpms, and when run
Cory Megitt [ClamAV] wrote:
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tim
Rupp
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 4:40 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] 0.75.1->80rc3 rpm failure??
Cory Megitt [ClamAV] wrote:
Hi All;
