On Monday 06 Sep 2004 07:17, Clamav wrote:
> message.c:1395: warning: passing arg 7 of `messageExport' from
> incompatible pointer type
>
> Are they serious??
No
> Wolfgang
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ban
Hello jef moskot,
> > SourceWear.com is selling some nice t-shirts and polo shirts
> > powered by ClamAV.
> Will you be making any with the old skool line-drawn clam logo?
Well, this is something you should ask to sourcewear.com :)
Anyway... I don't think so :|
Best regards
--
Luca Gibelli
On Friday 03 September 2004 16:42, Chris Meadors wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 11:47 +0200, Scott Ryan wrote:
> > Maybe you want to read the mail i sent again.
> > I use clamdscan not clamscan
> >
> > # man clamdscan
>
> Then do you have the "ScanMail" option set in the clamav.conf file set?
Yes -
> >I've been having problems with clamav. Every Sunday, clamav dies.
> > These are the last messages in the logs every week.
> >
> > ERROR: Can't unlink the socket file /var/run/clamav/clamd.ctl
> > ERROR: Can't unlink the pid file /var/run/clamav/clamd.pid
> > --- Stopped at Sun Aug 29 06:34:3
On Monday 06 Sep 2004 09:44, Scott Ryan wrote:
> Would it be possible for someone to check that this mail is trapped by clamav
> through a mail scanner? I can send it as an email file passwd zipped if it
> helps
password zipped e-mail to me will be fine.
> Much appreciated.
-Nigel
--
Nigel
On Friday 03 September 2004 07:13, Scott Ryan wrote:
> I had an issue with this a while back which was fixed by upgrading to
> latest devel and then eventually 0.75-1.
> I run qmail-scanner which in turn calls clamdscan. If i cat the message and
> pipe through clamdscan manually, clam reports that
Hi friends
I configured libgmp-4.1.3 with --enable-mpbsd
option,then make installed. After that, I´ve unpacked clamav-0.75.1 and ran
./configure-
The output send a warning disabling support for
digital signatures-
Mi system is a FreeBSD 5.2.
The ClamAV config file output send the following
l
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I installed clamav a few months ago, then upgraded to version 0.71 soon
>> after.
>
> The current version 0.75.1 . 0.71 will NOT catch all current viruses so
> you
> should upgrade first.
Okay, upgrade complete. It took all of 25 minutes, includin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I am wondering if there is any advantage of running freshclam as a
daemon as oppposed to running it from the crontab a few times day?
Thanks.
Dan
- --
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Daniel S. Cohen wrote:
> I am wondering if there is any advantage of running freshclam as a
> daemon as oppposed to running it from the crontab a few times day?
Yes. It maintains job security since it's another process that has the
potential to crash, thereby requiring you to
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Daniel S. Cohen wrote:
>
> > I am wondering if there is any advantage of running freshclam as a
> > daemon as oppposed to running it from the crontab a few times day?
>
> More seriously, it saves init from forking another process for
Daniel S. Cohen wrote:
Hello,
I am wondering if there is any advantage of running freshclam as a
daemon as oppposed to running it from the crontab a few times day?
Thanks.
Dan
It's a matter of taste. I prefer running it in daemon mode, as freshclam
is rock solid (eg. it hasn't crashed here for mon
- Original Message -
From: "Niek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 06, 2004 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] configure doesn´t see the gmp library ?
> On 9/6/2004 7:09 PM +0200, Claudio Adra wrote:
>
> > Hi friends
> > I configured libgmp-4.1.3 with
On Monday 06 September 2004 01:25 pm, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> It's a matter of taste. I prefer running it in daemon mode, as freshclam
> is rock solid (eg. it hasn't crashed here for months), and due to it's
> random start time does not tend to overload the mirrors.
> You have to use bashisms or perl
On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 02:16:48PM -0500, Jeff Smelser said:
> On Monday 06 September 2004 01:25 pm, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> > It's a matter of taste. I prefer running it in daemon mode, as freshclam
> > is rock solid (eg. it hasn't crashed here for months), and due to it's
> > random start time does
Working with clamdscan, using the --no-summary option seems to have no
effect whatsoever. I get the same output whether I use this option or
not. This is 0.75.1 on Mac OS X 10.3.5. Is anyone else experiencing
this?
--
Chris Jett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Christopher Jett wrote:
> Working with clamdscan, using the --no-summary option seems to have no
> effect whatsoever. I get the same output whether I use this option or
> not. This is 0.75.1 on Mac OS X 10.3.5. Is anyone else experiencing
> this?
--no-summary is clamscan on
17 matches
Mail list logo
