-Original Message-
From: Robin Lynn Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 June 2004 02:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Clamav-users] password protected zip files
> emails with the eicar test virus in password protected zip files were not
caught.
___SNIP___
On Friday 18 June 2004 03:12 am, Simon Fishley wrote:
> When you think about it though - does it really matter if you don't stop a
> virus in an encrypted archive file? Unless the recipient knows the
> password there is very little risk of damage. Not a very successful way of
> getting a virus to
On Friday 18 June 2004 9:12 am, Simon Fishley wrote:
> When you think about it though - does it really matter if you don't stop a
> virus in an encrypted archive file? Unless the recipient knows the
> password there is very little risk of damage. Not a very successful way of
> getting a virus to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
Does anyone have working QS Statistics with the above version of QS? The
statistics were working OK until I upgraded to 1.22st - now my
statistics look like this -> http://www.sk-branik.si/qss =(
- --
Thanks for the info and have a nice day,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrej Trobentar wrote:
| Hello all,
|
| Does anyone have working QS Statistics with the above version of QS? The
| statistics were working OK until I upgraded to 1.22st - now my
| statistics look like this -> http://www.sk-branik.si/qss =(
Ups, sorry,
Quoting Bill Randle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 19:16, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
I think the virus that's assaulting me is what this
page calls the PE_ZAFI.B virus:
http://www.trendmicro.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=PE_ZAFI.B&VSect=T
The clamav database lists a virus ca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
after having clamav up and running for a while -- it's great! thanks to
all who develop || support it -- there's still another topic in status
'wip': how to uncompress .sit, .sitx, and .hqx files (usually
sent/received by Mac users)?
i asked goo
Good Morning!
Some time ago I installed clamav from source on a FreeBSD 5.0 machine
that was also running Sendmail 8.12.10 and SA 2.63. Sendmail immediately
complained that it couldn't allocate any memory, so I abandoned the
project. At the time, I chalked it up to a FreeBSD issue. The 5.x tree
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 09:25:31 +0100
Antony Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 18 June 2004 9:12 am, Simon Fishley wrote:
>
> > When you think about it though - does it really matter if you don't
> > stop a virus in an encrypted archive file? Unless the recipient
> > knows the password t
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 at 15:24:27 +0200, Timo Schöler wrote:
>
> after having clamav up and running for a while -- it's great! thanks to
> all who develop || support it -- there's still another topic in status
> 'wip': how to uncompress .sit, .sitx, and .hqx files (usually
> sent/received by Mac
On Friday 18 June 2004 06:29 am, Jim Maul wrote:
> Its also interesting to note that even before clamav detected zafi it
> was being
> blocked by qmail-scanner:
>
> Jun 15 12:25:19 external qmail-scanner[29017]:
> Policy:Bad_MIME_Break:RC:0(24.188.90.209):SA:1(10.5/5.0): 2.184665 18140
> [EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Friday 18 June 2004 01:12, Simon Fishley wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin Lynn Frank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 18 June 2004 02:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Clamav-users] password protected zip files
>
> > e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Friday 18 June 2004 04:25, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> ClamAV is
> able to detect it (in contrast to many commercial scanners) and there's
> no need to reeject all encrypted files.
If you note my original post, password-protected zips were getting b
> On Thursday 17 June 2004 18:01, Matt wrote:
> > #ArchiveDetectEncrypted
>
>
> Hmm, my config file had #ArchiveBlockEncrypted
>
> I uncommented it and restarted clamd, but I wonder which is the correct one?
> - --
I could be wrong, but I think the later versions still accept the older synta
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:31:55 -0700
Robin Lynn Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> On Friday 18 June 2004 04:25, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > ClamAV is
> > able to detect it (in contrast to many commercial scanners) and
> > there's no need to reeje
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Friday 18 June 2004 10:46, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> In your original post you mentioned a problem with detection of the test
> #12 from testvirus.org. I consider this particular test (encrypted eicar
> test file) rather useless and stupefying and w
I've been using formail, procmail and clamav to
disinect a 200 MB mailbox, and since last night it's
only processed 80 MB of mail so far. It's a 350 Mhz
box that I'm running it on, and clamav must be pretty
CPU intensive.
Somebody tipped me off to the following procmail
config, which filters on t
Hi All,
I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it,
however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find an
easy way of determining the current version or date of the Virus DB
files. The --version switch the freshclam only reports the version of
freshclam
Lee W wrote:
Hi All,
I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it,
however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find an
easy way of determining the current version or date of the Virus DB
files. The --version switch the freshclam only reports the version
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 at 15:08:32 -0700, Michael D. Crawford wrote:
> I've been using formail, procmail and clamav to
> disinect a 200 MB mailbox, and since last night it's
> only processed 80 MB of mail so far. It's a 350 Mhz
That's a very slow progress! I suspect you use clamscan. So clamscan is
Ryan Moore said:
> Lee W wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have just compiled ClamAV and have started playing out with it,
>> however after reading though the man pages I have been unable to find an
>> easy way of determining the current version or date of the Virus DB
>> files. The --version switch the f
A list member suggested running clamd as root (temporarily, of course).
Sendmail no longer complains. I'm getting the following error now...
clamav-milter[17693]: Expected port information from clamd, got ''
sm-mta[17703]: i5J2IuTg017703: Milter: data, reject=451 4.7.1 Please try
again later
De
22 matches
Mail list logo
