On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:49:49 EDT "Jim Maul" wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frank
> > Elsner
> > Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 1:19 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Clamav-users] freshclam vs selfcheck
> >
> >
> >
Kevin Spicer wrote:
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 21:42, Bernard Elbourn wrote:
From a 1 year old installation
[snip]
Is it time to upgrade?
Oh yes. It was probably time to upgrade some months ago!
Virus scanning (and virus production) is an arms race, really well
advised to keep pace.
BMRB Intern
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 08:05, Bernard Elbourn wrote:
> Unfortunately this installation is remote to me so not so easy to just
> update. Shame I did not get any warning!
>
> How can I find out when I should update so I can plan ahead?
>
Subscribe to clamav-announce list. Generally speaking its a
Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
http://mail.limelyte.net/admin/virus/
NICE! We do something similar.
http://www.kineticweb.biz/virusreport.htm
I have a script that parses the log file and reads it into SQL. From there,
the rest is easy.
Just some wishfull thinking.. Would any of you care to share some sam
Kevin Spicer wrote:
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 08:05, Bernard Elbourn wrote:
Unfortunately this installation is remote to me so not so easy to just
update. Shame I did not get any warning!
How can I find out when I should update so I can plan ahead?
Subscribe to clamav-announce list. Generally spe
On Apr 29, 2004, at 3:03 PM, Jim Maul wrote:
Hi:
I have a question about the setup of clamav and postfix:
Use two instances of postfix is the only way to integrate clamav with
postfix?
Thanks.
I don't know if it's the *only* way, but it's how we use it (first
instance listens for incoming mail and
Nigel Horne wrote
> LogFile /dev/stderr will work on many systems
Slackware Linux complains if one uses the above - hence the
patch ;-) I'd be interested to know which OS's are ok with
the above?
In my original post, I forgot to mention the use of the
'Foreground' config entry when usi
Having a maximum at all makes it easy for someone to DoS you because a
thread is created for each new SMTP connection.. just connect X times and
don't start entering a sender address.
I think the thread maximum should be implemented around the actual virus
scan because having a thread which is ju
Dale Gallagher wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote
LogFile /dev/stderr will work on many systems
Slackware Linux complains if one uses the above - hence the
patch ;-) I'd be interested to know which OS's are ok with
the above?
In my original post, I forgot to mention the use of the
'Foreground
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Frank
> Elsner
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 2:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam vs selfcheck
>
>
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:49:49 EDT "Jim Maul" wrote:
> > > -Origi
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
Having a maximum at all makes it easy for someone to DoS you because a
thread is created for each new SMTP connection.. just connect X times and
don't start entering a sender address.
You dont have a max process/children configuration for sendmail? That
enables the same
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 13:06, Dale Gallagher wrote:
> Nigel Horne wrote
> > LogFile /dev/stderr will work on many systems
>
> Slackware Linux complains if one uses the above - hence the
> patch ;-) I'd be interested to know which OS's are ok with
> the above?
Perhaps on slackware (a dist
Hello Mike,
I appreciate your work on clamdwatch. Very nice utility. Should serve my
purpose well.
I do have one suggestion.
The exit code for clamdwatch should probably stick to standards, as
true && echo $?; false || echo $?
can demonstrate. 0 exit success, anything else error. (yes this is
Nigel Horne wrote:
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 13:06, Dale Gallagher wrote:
Nigel Horne wrote
LogFile /dev/stderr will work on many systems
Slackware Linux complains if one uses the above - hence the
patch ;-) I'd be interested to know which OS's are ok with
the above?
Pe
> >I'm running ClamAV on a PRODUCTION Windows email server using
> the snapshots
> >that Fajar provides.
> >
> WOW. Is it stable? How are you using it, with clamd or clamscan?
>
> >The server runs Ipswitch's IMail with Declude Virus
> >and Declude JunkMail addons.
> >
> >
> >
> AFAIK Declude runs c
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Joe Maimon wrote:
; Andy Fiddaman wrote:
; >How about implementing this as a semaphore in the eom callback, i.e.
; >
; >decrement semaphore;
; >scan using clamd
; >increment semaphore;
; >
; >That would limit the number of simultaneous scans and keep the
; >synchronisation com
On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 15:05, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:06:23 -0700
> "Mitch (WebCob)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just so all will know ;-)
> >
> > It seems that 0.65 isn't smart enough to notice the difference - I
> > didn't get the warning on that box... but I'm upgrading
Hi, I have problem with clamav 0.70 stable.
Malformed patter line 13898 (file
/var/spool/qmailscan/tmp/../viruses.db)
Incomplete block read
cli_cvdload(): Can't unpack CVD file
CVD extraction failure
This problem I see just with clamscan. I tried scan (by qmail-scanner)
with clamd/clamdscan
Andy Fiddaman wrote:
What I actually want to limit on my boxes is the number of concurrent scans,
not the number of milter threads since 1 thread == 1 incoming email (over
the initial signal threads etc.) and sendmail can control that itself.
Other people may have different priorities.
So
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of peter
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 12:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Clamav-users] malformed pattern
>
>
> Hi, I have problem with clamav 0.70 stable.
> Malformed patter line 13898 (file
> /v
Installed this machine about 2 weeks ago using the latest and greatest
version. This morning I am getting the following message when running
freshclam. I added asterisks to the new lines in question. Checked the
announce list and do not see a newer version. Is there a new version?
Thanks,
Ken
Cla
Should have said I'm
running clamav-0.70rc-1.i386.rpm Is there a newer version than
this?
On Friday 30 April 2004 6:08 pm, Ken Goods wrote:
> Installed this machine about 2 weeks ago using the latest and greatest
> version. This morning I am getting the following message when running
> freshclam. I added asterisks to the new lines in question. Checked the
> announce list and do not see
On Friday 30 April 2004 6:21 pm, Ken Goods wrote:
> Should have said I'm running clamav-0.70rc-1.i386.rpm Is there a newer
> version than this?
Clicking on the "Download - stable" link from http://www.clamav.net leads to
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/clamav where the latest version shown is
On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 09:26:14AM +0200, Kristof Hardy said:
> Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
> >>http://mail.limelyte.net/admin/virus/
> >NICE! We do something similar.
> >http://www.kineticweb.biz/virusreport.htm
> >I have a script that parses the log file and reads it into SQL. From there,
> >the res
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ken Goods
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 1:08 PM
> To: Clamav-Users (E-mail)
> Subject: [Clamav-users] This is new and I haven't change anything
>
>
> Installed this machine about 2 weeks ago using
Thank you much!
> -Original Message-
> From: Antony Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 10:39 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] oops
>
>
> On Friday 30 April 2004 6:21 pm, Ken Goods wrote:
>
> > Should have said I'm running clamav-0.
On Fri, 2004-04-30 at 12:21, Ken Goods wrote:
> Should have said I'm running clamav-0.70rc-1.i386.rpm Is there a newer
> version than this?
>
Yes, clamav-0.70 (not the release candidate) is out.
--
Daniel J McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Austin Energy
I have just incorporated ClamAV, using Mail::ClamAV in our mail filter
software. But every message, including the EICAR test returns 'clean'.
Is there any debugging I can enable that will tell me what is going on?
Any clues as to what I am doing that might be wrong.
I am calling it via:
my $oSta
29 matches
Mail list logo
