Payal Rathod wrote:
Hi,
I am using clamdscan with qmail in conjuction with dot-qmail files.
I have in .qmail
| /usr/local/bin/clamdscan -; [ $? != 1 ] || exit 99
./Maildir/
# ps aux | grep clamd
root 7967 0.0 4.2 29396 10776 ? S20:54 0:00 clamd
When I send a eicar test vrus it w
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 16:01:47 -0500
"Kevin Hanser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there a way to search for a particular virus? Not really important to
> be able to search, as long as I can get a listing of all the viruses
> that it catches
I just added a new option to sigtool: with --list-sigs
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 04:58:17 +
Payal Rathod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using clamdscan with qmail in conjuction with dot-qmail files.
> I have in .qmail
>
> | /usr/local/bin/clamdscan -; [ $? != 1 ] || exit 99
> ./Maildir/
>
> # ps aux | grep clamd
> root 7967 0.0 4.2 293
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 12:27:20 +1100
Darryl Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What's the difference between --unpack and --unpack-current? They both
>
> seem to do the same thing and produce identical output?
--unpack extracts a selected file while --unpack-current only extracts
files from the dat
Quoting jonathan soong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> hmm
> yes clamav does detect Bagle now, but when we first got hit with Bagle
> it was undetected for about 2 hours...
> (i.e. clamav virus db was about 2 hours behind our first sighting of
> it). I was just wondering how to
> add virus signatures to
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 09:38:17AM +0100, Thomas Lamy wrote:
> >
> You need to enable at least the "ScanMail" and "ScanArchive" directives
> in /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf (or whereever that file resides).
I did it. Stopped clamd. Restarted it. Still no luck. Same problem.
Where exactly is the pro
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 06:52:57AM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Take a look at contrib/trashscan and use it instead of clamdscan in
> .qmail.
It needs procmail, which I don't use. Also logger [???]
What is wrong with calmdscan? It caught eicar properly.
With regards,
-Payal
--
For GNU/Linux Succ
I also keep getting the same under sun solaris 8.
- Original Message -
From: Wouter de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 8:32 pm
Subject: [Clamav-users] ERROR: Malformed CVD header detected.
> Hi,
>
> Just to let you know, I am receiving these errors:
>
> ERROR:
> > You need to enable at least the "ScanMail" and "ScanArchive"
directives
> > in /usr/local/etc/clamav.conf (or whereever that file resides).
>
> I did it. Stopped clamd. Restarted it. Still no luck. Same problem.
> Where exactly is the problem?
I don't use "clamdscan", but in "clamscan" ther
These changes will make clamd compile under OSX10.1.
The bad news is it's rather doubtful that ClamAV supports that operating
system any more.
It's best to ask Tomasz to put the support back in.
The good news is that this part of the code is only called in the event
of a crash or through someth
I just upgraded from 0.54 to 0.65 on an OS X 10.1.5
box and now if I run clamscan it takes 1.5 hours to
run in place of about 20 mins.
I had to disable the thread support to get this to make and
I have no support for digital signatures (as I don't know
where to find it - fink doesn't seem to have i
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 08:56:16AM +, Trog wrote:
> >
> > file says you have to send it to
> > a SIGNING_SERVER?? - initially i wanted to just update our own
> > signatures, before worrying about sending it
> > to the clamav servers)
>
> All you need to do is create an old style db file with
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 at 12:51:44 +1100, Darryl Luff wrote:
> Has anyone noticed that enabling the LogSyslog option causes everything
> to be logged twice? Or is it just something odd on my machine (sample
> below)?
>
> Jan 20 00:11:02 gateway clamd[19226]: Reading databases from
> /var/lib/clama
Hello:
In the past few days we have experienced multiple stability problems with clamav. Here
is our environment:
Solaris 9 (sparc)
mimedefang 2.36 w/ sendmail 8.12.10
clamav 0.65
The problems appear to be two fold:
1) freshclam, run as a daemon, crashes without sending a notify.
freshc
If you're using qmail, look into qmailscanner..
[http://qmail-scanner.sourceforge.net/]... build a string of virus
checkers (includeing it's own built-in perl scanner) to process your mail...
We use it on a system with 18000+ messages a day, running each through
spamassassin and clamav without
Hi, Jon
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 11:45:11 -0500
"Jon R. Kibler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello:
>
> In the past few days we have experienced multiple stability problems with
> clamav. Here is our environment:
>
> Solaris 9 (sparc)
> mimedefang 2.36 w/ sendmail 8.12.10
> clamav 0.65
>
> The prob
Jon R. Kibler wrote:
1) freshclam, run as a daemon, crashes without sending a notify.
freshclam appears to die anytime it finds a problem with a database update instead of just
reporting the error and keep on running to try again later.
Run freshclam from crontab, works like a charm.
Jon R. Kibler wrote:
Hello:
In the past few days we have experienced multiple stability problems with clamav. Here is our environment:
Solaris 9 (sparc)
mimedefang 2.36 w/ sendmail 8.12.10
clamav 0.65
Isn't 0.65 known to have problems? I use daily snapshot (devel-20040115)
and it works fine
Hello,
Since a couple of days I'm using clamd/clamdscan on an OpenBSD
(snapshot/i386) machine. Clamd is started at boot time and clamdscan is
being used by means of a maildrop filter...
if (`/usr/local/bin/clamdscan --mbox --disable-summary --stdout - | grep -c
'FOUND'` == 1)
{
to "$DEFAULT/.
Hello
About since the "big-virus" import of about 10'000 viruses I experience
a lot of problems with the until then stable ClamAV 0.65 on
OpenBSD/Sparc64 and i386.
clamd hangs at leats twice a day, does no longer respond to network
connections. It has to be killed and restarted. It has becom
On Jan 21, 2004, at 3:11 AM, Nigel Horne wrote:
These changes will make clamd compile under OSX10.1.
The bad news is it's rather doubtful that ClamAV supports that
operating system any more.
It's best to ask Tomasz to put the support back in.
The good news is that this part of the code is only
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 at 11:45:11 -0500, Jon R. Kibler wrote:
[...]
> This was submitted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] yesterday... just curious, is there
any type of acknowledgment that we should expect from such submittals?
>
[...]
Jon,
the server which serves your domain (mx001.mail.trustem.net) permane
> Since a couple of days I'm using clamd/clamdscan on an OpenBSD
> (snapshot/i386) machine. Clamd is started at boot time and
> clamdscan is being used by means of a maildrop filter... if
> (`/usr/local/bin/clamdscan --mbox --disable-summary --stdout
> - | grep -c 'FOUND'` == 1) {
> to "$DE
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 19:52:45 +0100
Björn Ketelaars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2.) When using StreamSaveToDisk clamdscan is initiated, does its
> thing.and does not die! The result of clamdscan not dying is that
> after a couple of hours there are about 40 (or more...) clamdscan
> processes runni
I've been seeing some viruses come in due to clamd timing out. What
concerns me is that these emails arrive with the:
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter version '0.60p'
header in place, but in fact it *hasn't* been scanned.
--
Orion Poplawski
System Ad
Hi All!
Since clamd in 0.65 is much too unstable here (stops responding within
minutes), we have been running several development snapshots here. all
the snapshots from the last 14 days or so seem to massivily leak memory.
typically our mailrelays do run out of memory(1GB physical and 2Gb swap)
The Mailscanner docs tells us to make two queues and run two copies of
sendmail:
drwxr-x--- 2 root bin 62976 Oct 23 16:18 mqueue
drwxr-x--- 2 root bin 41472 Oct 23 16:18 mqueue.in
sendmail -bd -OPrivacyOptions=noetrn -ODeliveryMode=queueonly -OQueueDirecto
ry=/var/spool/mqueue.in
At 01:37 PM 1/21/2004, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
Since clamd in 0.65 is much too unstable here (stops responding within
minutes), we have been running several development snapshots here. all the
snapshots from the last 14 days or so seem to massivily leak memory.
typically our mailrelays do ru
Leif Neland wrote:
How does this fit in with sendmail 8.12 already having two queues, mqueue
and mqueue-client?
You really should have posted this on the MailScanner list since nothing
of this is Clam related. However the mqueue-client does not have a
physical queue, instead it's a way of pickin
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 22:19, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> Leif Neland wrote:
> > How does this fit in with sendmail 8.12 already having two queues, mqueue
> > and mqueue-client?
>
> You really should have posted this on the MailScanner list since nothing
> of this is Clam related.
I'll second that,
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 at 12:51:44 +1100, Darryl Luff wrote:
Has anyone noticed that enabling the LogSyslog option causes everything
to be logged twice? Or is it just something odd on my machine (sample
below)?
Jan 20 00:11:02 gateway clamd[19226]: Reading databases from
31 matches
Mail list logo
