Follwing problem with (devel-20040108, clamav-milter version '0.66c'):
After several days I eventually get the following messages in clamd.log
(about 200 times):
Sat Jan 17 20:38:01 2004 -> ERROR: ScanStream: accept() failed. Sat Jan
17 20:40:20 2004 -> ERROR: accept() failed. Sat Jan 17 20:40:20
Hi folks,
I need to install clamav to check my filesystem.
I've tried with clamav-0.65 port: I've installed anything, I've created the
/etc/clamav.conf and the _clamd user/group, but when I try to use freshclam
or clamd I receive this message:
/usr/libexec/ld.so: clamd: libpthread.so.20.20: No su
Hello,
There's a big problem with libpthread on obsd, a port exists on
http://www.activeintra.net/projects/clamav/.
I hope it'll work after.
Bye, LOYET Jerome
-> -Message d'origine-
-> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part
-> de Andrea Riela
-> Envoyé : lund
there is no problem with openbsd's libpthread. the problem has to do
with the way clamav get's built. i would be surprised that you were
able to build it then get an error like that. you don't have gnu
pthreads installed do you? If so remove it, you don't need it. try
the port though, it s
Quoting Philipp Grosswiler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So, how is clamd behaving with the patch and ThreadTimout=0?
> >
> > Is it any better?
>
> It is actually better, but unfortunately, there still seems to be a
> problem
> somewhere.
If you have can put an accurate time on when clamd stopped r
> If you have can put an accurate time on when clamd stopped
> responding, would it correspond to their being a virus DB update?
I don't think so.
> I assume that you do automatic updates and this is signalled
> to clamd (probably via freshclam --daemon-notify).
That's true, I am doing automat
> http://www.activeintra.net/projects/clamav/.
Ok,
It looks like it's working.
That is the latest release for openbsd?
Thanks
Andrea
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integr
I was a bit confused when I first tried writing a script to connect to
clamd 0.65 on a remote server and do scanning via the STREAM command:
1 - I expected to be able to do multiple commands per TCP session... for
example:
-- connection established
C: PING
S: PONG
C: STREAM
S: PORT
...
S: s
Le Lun 19 jan 08:46:36 2004, Jim Ramsay écrit:
>
> 3 - The "PING" command doesn't seem to be very useful in the light of
> each command running in its own TCP session. If I get a PONG back, I
> know that the server is sane. But then I have to make another TCP
> connection to do any other work
Laurent Wacrenier wrote:
PING/PONG is useless. It could have been better if the server had send
a banner at connection startup.
Good point - that's much better for determining server state upon
connection. This banner should also include the clamd version so that
you don't have to use a separat
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:04:57 -0500
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Test #6: Eicar virus embedded within another MIME segment
> Test #11: Eicar virus within a ZIP file
> Test #13: Eicar virus sent in a Microsoft TNEF file (winmail.dat)
...
> I'm not overly surprised about the last three, but it
yes that is the latest, I have yet to play with the latest snaps. i
need to test on 3.4, but I am not ready to deploy 3.4 on my server
(mostly because of the change from a.out to elf).
regards,
flinn
On Jan 19, 2004, at 9:43 AM, Andrea Riela wrote:
http://www.activeintra.net/projects/clamav/.
Anybody seen these yet?
http://www.viruslist.com/eng/alert.html?id=783050
There has been some discussion on bugtraq about it's payload today.
Just curious...
Tom Walsh
Network Administrator
http://www.ala.net/
---
The SF.Net email is spon
Hi,
Seen clamav catch a few on some of my servers today.
Rick
Tom Walsh wrote:
Anybody seen these yet?
http://www.viruslist.com/eng/alert.html?id=783050
There has been some discussion on bugtraq about it's payload today.
Just curious...
Tom Walsh
Network Administrator
http://www.ala.net/
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 20:57, Tom Walsh wrote:
> Anybody seen these yet?
>
> http://www.viruslist.com/eng/alert.html?id=783050
>
> There has been some discussion on bugtraq about it's payload today.
>
> Just curious...
>
Yeah, we had about 30 today so far. It seems to be spreading quite
rapidl
> Yeah, we had about 30 today so far. It seems to be spreading
> quite rapidly. Good news is its supposed to deactivate on the 28th.
I just have to say it... I love ClamAV. :)
Thanks for the reports guys.
Tom Walsh
Network Administrator
http://www.ala.net/
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Kevin Spicer wrote:
> Yeah, we had about 30 today so far. It seems to be spreading quite
> rapidly. Good news is its supposed to deactivate on the 28th.
Only 30? I've seen over 500 on my mail systems since getting the new sigs
late last night. Kudos to Diego for getting t
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 21:31, Tim Wilde wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Kevin Spicer wrote:
>
> > Yeah, we had about 30 today so far. It seems to be spreading quite
> > rapidly. Good news is its supposed to deactivate on the 28th.
>
> Only 30? I've seen over 500 on my mail systems since getting t
It works fine on Openbsd 3.4 --stable, other then the items this list is already aware
of like crashing without notice once in a while.
rm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Flinn
Mueller
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 2:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTE
Roy Morris wrote:
It works fine on Openbsd 3.4 --stable, other then the items this list is already aware of like crashing without notice once in a while.
rm
I actually managed to get ClamAV 0.65 running rock solid. It has been
running now for nearly 2 months without any problems. I am using OpenB
how much email do you get? Mine usually runs for about 6 days or so then pops. I get
around 200 msg/hr on the server. I stopped using it until the next version, hoping it
would be more stable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wouter de
Vrie
arr> Test #6: Eicar virus embedded within another MIME segment
arr> Test #11: Eicar virus within a ZIP file
arr> Test #13: Eicar virus sent in a Microsoft TNEF file (winmail.dat)
tk> #6 and #13 should be handled by mimedefang (and it should execute clamscan
tk> on already parsed files) however I
Ditto. My version of clamav-0.65 is running since 22 Dec 03 (last time
I rebooted for security reasons). Before that it was pretty solid as
well.
Regards,
Flinn
On Jan 19, 2004, at 5:02 PM, Wouter de Vries wrote:
Roy Morris wrote:
It works fine on Openbsd 3.4 --stable, other then the items th
On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 15:24:20 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Dec 2003 00:05:45 +
> Marty Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Please find attached the patch; the code that was overloading the
>> _trailer->z_magic area with the offset was the offending item. I've
>> manually mapped the
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:38:02 -0500
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm wondering if there's an issue because Solaris ships with an unzip
> but not a zip. I was hoping that someone also running Solaris would
> be able to let me know if I just needed to install a third party zip
> package with both bi
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:49:28 -0700
Tommy McNeely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am afflicted with the __zzip_find_disk_trailer crash.. which I think
> this patch fixes.. but either my firewall is acting stupid, or there
The patch was broken and has been reversed recently in CVS.
Best regards,
To
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 03:30:38 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 16:49:28 -0700
> Tommy McNeely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am afflicted with the __zzip_find_disk_trailer crash.. which I think
>> this patch fixes.. but either my firewall is acting stupid, or there
>
> The patch
27 matches
Mail list logo
