[Clamav-users] Critical bug in virus scanning engine (development versions only)

2004-01-03 Thread Tomasz Kojm
Dear Users, all ClamAV snapshots newer than clamav-20031201 contain a bug that completely disables detection of polymorphic viruses (Hybris, Magistr) and other malware with multipart signatures. Please update to the latest version and make sure the changelog contains the following entry: * libcla

Re: [Clamav-users] Critical bug in virus scanning engine (development versions only)

2004-01-03 Thread Odhiambo Washington
* Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20040103 13:43]: wrote: > Dear Users, > > all ClamAV snapshots newer than clamav-20031201 contain a bug that > completely disables detection of polymorphic viruses (Hybris, Magistr) > and other malware with multipart signatures. Please

[Clamav-users] RE: freshclam not finding database mirror

2004-01-03 Thread Alex S Moore
On Solaris 8 and 9 SPARC and x86, I have been building and using clamav for quite some time. However, from the last CVS source, freshclam will not run and returns the following error. ERROR: You must specify at least one database mirror. Nothing has changed in my build scripts and I do not use q

Re: [Clamav-users] Critical bug in virus scanning engine (development versions only)

2004-01-03 Thread Graham Murray
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > all ClamAV snapshots newer than clamav-20031201 contain a bug that > completely disables detection of polymorphic viruses (Hybris, Magistr) > and other malware with multipart signatures. Please update to the latest > version and make sure the changelog con

Re: [Clamav-users] Critical bug in virus scanning engine (development versions only)

2004-01-03 Thread Nigel Horne
On Saturday 03 Jan 2004 3:27 pm, Graham Murray wrote: > As this update is required, could someone *please* look at the > problem which clamav-milter has with messages delivered by IPv6. I > have mentioned this a couple of times on this list but nobody has > commented on it. Is this not the correct

Re: [Clamav-users] RE: freshclam not finding database mirror

2004-01-03 Thread Alex S Moore
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 07:37:05 -0600 Alex S Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Solaris 8 and 9 SPARC and x86, I have been building and using clamav for > quite some time. However, from the last CVS source, freshclam will not run > and returns the following error. > > ERROR: You must specify at l

Re: [Clamav-users] RE: freshclam not finding database mirror

2004-01-03 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 07:37:05 -0600 Alex S Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Solaris 8 and 9 SPARC and x86, I have been building and using > clamav for quite some time. However, from the last CVS source, > freshclam will not run and returns the following error. > > ERROR: You must specify at l

Re: [Clamav-users] Critical bug in virus scanning engine (development versions only)

2004-01-03 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 14:08:13 +0300 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the cvs servers are acting up, could you kindly post a tarball > of the "latest" to the list. The lastest snapshot on the website is http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-20040103-fixe

Re: [Clamav-users] RE: freshclam not finding database mirror

2004-01-03 Thread Alex S Moore
On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 16:52:05 +0100 Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You must configure /usr/local/etc/freshclam.conf - it should contain at > least the following directives: > > DatabaseMirror database.clamav.net > MaxAttempts 3 > > You will find the template in /etc. > Yes, that is w

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav with postfix

2004-01-03 Thread Nigel Horne
On Saturday 03 Jan 2004 4:54 pm, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > I know I can get mail scanned by invoking clamscan from either blackhole or > amavisd. Since I don't need all the features of either of these, does > anyone know of another low-overhead means of having mail scanned? If you are using sendm

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav with postfix

2004-01-03 Thread Ken McKittrick
Hello Using Postfix with Amavisd-new and clamav is well documented and easy to get running. I'd recommend using clamav that way. sincerely Ken McKittrick USADatanet On Jan 3, 2004, at 11:54 AM, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: I know I can get mail scanned by invoking clamscan from either blackhole or

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav with postfix

2004-01-03 Thread Franco Gasperino
On Saturday 03 January 2004 08:54 am, Robin Lynn Frank wrote: > I know I can get mail scanned by invoking clamscan from either blackhole or > amavisd. Since I don't need all the features of either of these, does > anyone know of another low-overhead means of having mail scanned? > > TIA You're