On Monday 26 May 2003 12:53 am, Sean Rima wrote:
> On 25 May 2003, Stephen White spake:
> > clamscan --mbox should work
>
> This I thought would find it but it did not, still maybe Mime is outside
> of clamav atm
Send me a copy of the original infected email and I'll look into why it wasn't decod
> Thanks! Now if someone could just figure out where freshclam is going
> wrong and fix it... ;-)
Please test the latest version.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(\/)\. http://www.konarski.edu.pl/~zolw
\..._ I nie zapomn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26 May 2003, Nigel Horne spake:
> On Monday 26 May 2003 12:53 am, Sean Rima wrote:
>> On 25 May 2003, Stephen White spake:
>
>>> clamscan --mbox should work
>>
>> This I thought would find it but it did not, still maybe Mime is
>> outside of clamav
The latest snapshot seems to be very stable under BSD. Ken McKittrick has
provided me with a full access to a FreeBSD 4.8 box for extensive clamav
testing. I'm also testing it under my FreeBSD 5.0 and everything looks fine,
but my main testing rule is: No crash for a week. Some time ago I received
> Hi !
>
> I'v installer ClamAV on a qmail-server running qmailqueue patch and
> qmail-scanner.
>
> When testing from the adress above many of the test mails get passed
> clamscan.
>
> --
> 7791 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. Clear:. Processed in
> 0.372957 secs); 23 May 20
