On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:44:02 +
Chris Hastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still finding the same problems with trying to close down clamd
> cleanly. It picks up a TERM signal, the log says it's closing, but the
> process is left running but not responding and the socket file left in
> pl
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 10:59:44 +0300
Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021031 03:06]: wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:44:02 +
> > Chris Hastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 15:38:18 +0300
Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is a THANK YOU for Nigel and Tomasz for their work on this latest
> release. I was able to scan an mbox file of over 31MB successfully using
> this version. This was not possible with 0.51.
>
> However, I
* Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021031 13:55]: wrote:
> > On my 4.7-STABLE boxes I don't have a problem at all. I am running clamd
> > and also have a cron job that monitors whether it's alive or dead and restarts
> > it and I haven't had a problem so
* Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021031 03:06]: wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:44:02 +
> Chris Hastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm still finding the same problems with trying to close down clamd
> > cleanly. It picks up a TERM sign
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>* Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20021031 03:06]: wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:44:02 +
>> Chris Hastie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm still finding the same
