> It just looks confusing. Those are the filenames in the /tmp/viruses
> directory, and clamscan was reporting "OK" for each of the files (which
> have the very long filenames). These are maildir files produced by the
> courier mail server.
If you want to scan directly the mail files, you need us
On Wed, 7 May 2003 14:28:00 +0200 (CEST) Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Please test the newest version from http://clamav.elektrapro.com/snapshot,
> old code is known to ignore some types of attachments.
>
Is the newest version the one from April 3? Is there a newer one somewhere?
Ricardo
Hello Tomasz,
On Wed, 7 May 2003 14:28:00 +0200 (CEST) Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> >
> > So with --mbox, it only finds 3 of the 9 infected.
>
> Please test the newest version from http://clamav.elektrapro.com/snapshot,
> old code is known to ignore some types of attachments.
Ok, I'll try that out.
>
> So with --mbox, it only finds 3 of the 9 infected.
Please test the newest version from http://clamav.elektrapro.com/snapshot,
old code is known to ignore some types of attachments.
> With individual file scanning, NO viruses are found... :-( how can that be?
>
> # clamscan /tmp/viruses
>
