Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan chokes on this email

2003-09-23 Thread Nigel Horne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 22 Sep 2003 4:59 pm, René Bellora wrote: > clamscan: message.c:739: decodeLine: Assertion `strlen(line) <= 76' failed. Thank you for the sample file. I ran it against the latest version and got this output: LibClamAV Warning: Illegal chara

Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan chokes on this email

2003-09-22 Thread Thomas Lamy
René Bellora wrote: hi! live virus sample in: http://rana.dyndns.org/mbox.txt i'm using clamscan version 20030829, and when i do 'clamscan --mbox' on the aforementioned, i get: clamscan: message.c:739: decodeLine: Assertion `strlen(line) <= 76' failed. Aborted it seems that the encoding h

Re: [Clamav-users] clamscan chokes on this email

2003-09-22 Thread Miguel Bettencourt Dias (Netopia)
On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 19:40, René Bellora wrote: > hi! > > live virus sample in: http://rana.dyndns.org/mbox.txt > > i'm using clamscan version 20030829, and when i do 'clamscan --mbox' > on the aforementioned, i get: > > clamscan: message.c:739: decodeLine: Assertion `strlen(line) <= 7

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan chokes

2003-05-20 Thread Jeff M
> charm, until today. It seems that clamscan chokes on certain messages, > doing nothing but eating CPU time. Is it a coincidence, or could this > new Worm.Palyh.A worm have something to do with it ? I was looking for a virus scanner today and in reading your maillist logs, I just had to point o

Re: [clamav-users] clamscan chokes

2003-05-19 Thread Stephen White
Original Message > From Piet Ruyssinck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Monday, 19 May 2003, 20:15 > > charm, until today. It seems that clamscan chokes on certain messages, > doing nothing but eating CPU time. Is it a coincidence, or could this > new Worm.Palyh.A worm have something to do w