On May 13, 2014, at 4:24 AM, Al Varnell
mailto:alvarn...@mac.com>> wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:04 AM, James Lee wrote:
(Please don't top post.)
Please leave moderation functions to the moderators. There could possibly be a
rule preventing it, but I’m unaware of any and there are example
On 13/05/2014 09:24, Al Varnell wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:04 AM, James Lee wrote:
(Please don't top post.)
Please leave moderation functions to the moderators. There could possibly be a
rule preventing it, but I’m unaware of any and there are examples in this
thread of Sourcefire con
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 01:04 AM, James Lee wrote:
>
> (Please don't top post.)
Please leave moderation functions to the moderators. There could possibly be a
rule preventing it, but I’m unaware of any and there are examples in this
thread of Sourcefire contributors top posting. For technica
On 12/05/2014 21:33, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote:
So, what's the definitive answer.
To what question? (Please don't top post.) The OP's question relating
to "Can't allocate memory" has been answered.
James.
___
Help us build a comprehensiv
So, what's the definitive answer.
I gave up late Friday night on getting it working on Solaris for the weekend
maintenance window.
Though the last thing I tried was to force "-D__EXTENSIONS__" in...and caught
a glimpse of it finally finishing its compile as I was securing my workstation.
I a
James Lee wrote:
On 10/05/2014 17:34, Shawn Webb wrote:
Hello,
The attached two patches will make building (with gcc)
I'm not but..
and running on Solaris work.
when using gcc configure sets HAVE_ATTRIB_PACKED=1 and the problem doesn't
exist, ie, no patch is needed for gcc.
In fact no pa
On 10/05/2014 17:34, Shawn Webb wrote:
Hello,
The attached two patches will make building (with gcc)
I'm not but..
and running on Solaris work.
when using gcc configure sets HAVE_ATTRIB_PACKED=1 and the problem
doesn't exist, ie, no patch is needed for gcc.
In fact no patches need for c
Hey All,
The attached two patches will make building (with gcc) and running on
Solaris work. I've also pasted them to the below linked sites in case the
attachments don't go through. The patches ought to be applied in order.
Patch 1: http://ix.io/ceV (001-clamav-solaris.patch)
Patch 2: http://ix.
On 10/05/2014 11:22, James Lee wrote:
I think it is intended to call this via cl_initialize_crypto(), except
it's not called.
"__attribute__((constructor))" works, compiler tested, but not here.
...
Please don't take this as final, it's just a hint towards the problem.
Indeed it's the usual
May 8 07:44:31 mailhost freshclam[3924]: [ID 702911 mail.error]
Verification: Can't allocate memory
"Can't allocate memory" is the wrong message; it's not short of memory.
The problem is failure to initialise openssl by calling
OpenSSL_add_all_digests() resulting in EVP_get_digestbyname()
On 09/05/2014 14:56, Joel Esler (jesler) wrote:
Hello,
Don't get over excited about Sparc, freshclam has the same problem on
i386 Solaris.
...
May 8 07:41:13 mailhost freshclam[3924]: [ID 702911 mail.info]
freshclam daemon 0.98.3 (OS: solaris2.10, ARCH: i386, CPU: i386)
May 8 07:41:13 mai
Lars Hecking wrote:
I've been building with static openssl for a while as well, and am still
using gcc 3.4.6 as I couldn't get newer versions to compile - although
it seems possible, and I'll try again; maybe using gcc 4.7 or 4.6.
Well, 4.7.3 doesn't build for me. Trying 4.6.4 now. Us
On May 8, 2014, at 12:50 PM, Dennis Peterson
mailto:denni...@inetnw.com>> wrote:
On 5/8/14, 9:00 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 5/8/14, 8:23 AM, Shawn Webb wrote:
Hey Martin,
Is there a way you can get to me main.cvd.broken? I'm wondering if the
change to OpenSSL for hashing has somehow changed p
On May 8, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Dennis Peterson
mailto:denni...@inetnw.com>> wrote:
On 5/8/14, 8:23 AM, Shawn Webb wrote:
Hey Martin,
Is there a way you can get to me main.cvd.broken? I'm wondering if the
change to OpenSSL for hashing has somehow changed parsing CVDs and CLDs on
big-endian machines
On 5/8/14, 9:00 AM, Dennis Peterson wrote:
On 5/8/14, 8:23 AM, Shawn Webb wrote:
Hey Martin,
Is there a way you can get to me main.cvd.broken? I'm wondering if the
change to OpenSSL for hashing has somehow changed parsing CVDs and CLDs on
big-endian machines running Solaris. I thoroughly teste
On 8 May 2014 at 11:23, Shawn Webb wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Martin Preen <
> Is there a way you can get to me main.cvd.broken? I'm wondering if the
> change to OpenSSL for hashing has somehow changed parsing CVDs and CLDs on
> big-endian machines running Solaris. I thoroughly test
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 5:23 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
> I can install Solaris on this sparc64 machine as early as next week.
OpenCSW provides a complete Solaris build farm if you're interested,
we used to host automatic builds for ClamAV before Sourcefire aquired
it.
http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it
On 5/8/14, 8:23 AM, Shawn Webb wrote:
Hey Martin,
Is there a way you can get to me main.cvd.broken? I'm wondering if the
change to OpenSSL for hashing has somehow changed parsing CVDs and CLDs on
big-endian machines running Solaris. I thoroughly tested the code on a
sparc64 machine (an old SunF
Shawn Webb wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Martin Preen <
pr...@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
Hello,
after building 0.98.3 on Solaris 10 (Sparc) I got some error
messages from freshclam.
The first run:
ERROR: Corrupted database file /var/clamav/main.cvd: Can't allocate memory
Cor
Shawn Webb wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Martin Preen <
pr...@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
Hello,
after building 0.98.3 on Solaris 10 (Sparc) I got some error
messages from freshclam.
The first run:
ERROR: Corrupted database file /var/clamav/main.cvd: Can't allocate memory
Cor
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Martin Preen <
pr...@informatik.uni-freiburg.de> wrote:
> Hello,
> after building 0.98.3 on Solaris 10 (Sparc) I got some error
> messages from freshclam.
>
> The first run:
>
> ERROR: Corrupted database file /var/clamav/main.cvd: Can't allocate memory
> Corrupted
21 matches
Mail list logo
