> Unless something has changed again that I missed, the INetMsg signatures
> are no
> longer maintained.
That's still correct... just in case anyone else missed the updates,
here's the last two announcements, as there were a few new databases too:
http://www.freelists.org/post/sanesecurity/data
On 8/20/12 6:41 AM, G.W. Haywood wrote:
The vast majority of those will be detected via
third-party databases, in particular at the moment INetMsg.SpamDomain
is running at about 50% and Sansecurity about 20% of detections.
Unless something has changed again that I missed, the INetMsg signature
>>It isn't clear to me whether you are accepting or rejecting unwanted
>>mail. My advice is to reject all unwanted mail. If you accept it,
>>the scrotes will just send more of the stuff.
My current configuration has me accepting anything that might be spam,
although, frankly, I can't remember t
Hi there,
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Mark A. Olbert wrote:
... now there's a lot more stuff to review before reporting. ...
Your statistics seem a bit grim to me. It certainly sounds like a lot
of work which might not be necessary. On a typical business day we
see something between five and ten t
