On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 01:59:21PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
>
> Footnotes:
> [1] s/clamscan/clamdscan/ sound familiar?
Hi,
That's definitely my fault. I will update the documentation about clamdscan
and try to make it more compatible with clamscan. Anyway most software is
able to use clamd its
On Wednesday 19 Mar 2003 6:52 pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> clamd still doesn't work properly on FreeBSD due to the broken BSD pthreads
I have a fix for this which I'll be sending you ASAP.
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Kojm
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Conductor, Typesetter.
NJH Music,
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Dave Sill wrote:
> Ed Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Dave Sill wrote:
> >
> > > This is pretty important limitation to using clamd/clamdscan. Is it
> > > documented?
> >
> > Sure... run "man intro" on most any Unix system and read the part abou
Ed Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Dave Sill wrote:
>
> > This is pretty important limitation to using clamd/clamdscan. Is it
> > documented?
>
> Sure... run "man intro" on most any Unix system and read the part about
> permissions, uids, etc., ... ;-)
Very funny, Ed
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Dave Sill wrote:
> Date: 20 Mar 2003 11:27:05 -0500
> From: Dave Sill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [clamav-users] Clamav and qmail - your experiences and
> opinions
>
> Tomasz K
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:09:22PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> >
> > OK, I tried that on my RH 8.0, clamav-20030317, qmail-scanner-1.16
> > system and got:
> >
> > 19/03/2003 15:53:06:3757: --output of clamscan was:
> > /var/spool/qmailscan/sws51048107
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 04:09:22PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:25:41PM +0100, Daniel Wiberg wrote:
> > > What are these modifications? Just "sed -e s/clamscan/clamdscan/
> > > qmail-scanner-queue.pl"?
> >
> > exactly
>
> OK,
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:25:41PM +0100, Daniel Wiberg wrote:
> > What are these modifications? Just "sed -e s/clamscan/clamdscan/
> > qmail-scanner-queue.pl"?
>
> exactly
OK, I tried that on my RH 8.0, clamav-20030317, qmail-scanner-1.16
system and go
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:25:41PM +0100, Daniel Wiberg wrote:
> What are these modifications? Just "sed -e s/clamscan/clamdscan/
> qmail-scanner-queue.pl"?
exactly
> Is current clamdscan in a working state? It segfaults for me when
> archive scanning is enabled on FreeBSD 4.6.2, and 0.54 doesn
What are these modifications? Just "sed -e s/clamscan/clamdscan/
qmail-scanner-queue.pl"?
Is current clamdscan in a working state? It segfaults for me when
archive scanning is enabled on FreeBSD 4.6.2, and 0.54 doesn't support
archive scanning AFAIK.
//daniel wiberg
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
qmail
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 07:59:40PM +0100, Tomasz Nidecki wrote:
> > qmail + qmail-scanner - modified to use clamdscan instead of clamscan
> > should work fine.
>
> Thx, but qmail-scanner demands a recompilation of qmail with the
> qmail-queue patch 8[...
Applying the QMAILQUEUE patch is extremely
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 05:55:41PM +0100, Tomasz Nidecki wrote:
> - not require a recompilation of qmail (would supply a qmail-queue
> script which would call the scanner and then the original qmail-queue)
>
> - take little memory, be streamlined and fast.
qmail + qmail-scanner - modified to use
Quoting Tomasz Nidecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi, all 8].
>
> I'm currently working on setting up clamav on my server (a small local
> network). My MTA is qmail. I was wondering what are your opinions and
> experiences with the two working together?
>
I found that Postfix, amavis-new, and clamav
13 matches
Mail list logo
