Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail: clmilter.sock is unsafe: I AM AN IDIOT

2004-03-22 Thread B. van Ouwerkerk
You probably want the -b option to reject the DATA phase of the SMTP session if the milter detects a virus. No you dont need '-b option'. I'm new to Clamav but from the manpage it looks like -N would be more appropriate. If I understand everything correctly then -b will bounce the message with

Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail: clmilter.sock is unsafe: I AM AN IDIOT

2004-03-22 Thread Steven Stern
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 16:33:36 +0100, Krištof Petr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Be sure your virus db is up to date by running freshclam. > >Petr crontab -l [snip] 17 */4 * * * /usr/bin/freshclam --quiet -l /var/log/clam-update.log -- Steve -

RE: [Clamav-users] sendmail: clmilter.sock is unsafe: I AM AN IDIOT

2004-03-22 Thread Nigel Horne
> You probably want the -b option to reject the DATA phase of the SMTP > session if the milter detects a virus. Using the -b option is not recommended. -Nigel --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial pr

Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail: clmilter.sock is unsafe: I AM AN IDIOT

2004-03-22 Thread Krištof Petr
Steven Stern wrote: so what's supposed to happen when it detects a virus? When I send myself a message with eicar.com attached, this header gets added, but nothing is done: What does it mean "nothing is done" exactly? Tha mail is delivered to recipient or is it rejected? X-Virus-Scanned: clamd /

Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail: clmilter.sock is unsafe: I AM AN IDIOT

2004-03-22 Thread Krištof Petr
Ryan Moore wrote: The sock file was defined with one name in sendmail.mc and another in the configuration file for the milter itself. I made them the same and sendmail is happy. so what's supposed to happen when it detects a virus? When I send myself a message with eicar.com attached, this he

Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail: clmilter.sock is unsafe: I AM AN IDIOT

2004-03-19 Thread Ryan Moore
Steven Stern wrote: On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:55:03 -0600, Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It works appropriately if the mail comes from an external server. I'm leaving -b in place and will see how it goes for a while. -- Steve Yea thats how we do it here, I wasn't thinking mail bei

Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail: clmilter.sock is unsafe: I AM AN IDIOT

2004-03-19 Thread Steven Stern
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:55:03 -0600, Steven Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It works appropriately if the mail comes from an external server. I'm leaving -b in place and will see how it goes for a while. -- Steve --- This SF.Net email

Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail: clmilter.sock is unsafe: I AM AN IDIOT

2004-03-19 Thread Steven Stern
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:51:11 -0500, Ryan Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >You probably want the -b option to reject the DATA phase of the SMTP >session if the milter detects a virus. > I added the -b option to clamav-milter. As root, i typed " cat eircar.com | mail steve -s test " Sendmail

Re: [Clamav-users] sendmail: clmilter.sock is unsafe: I AM AN IDIOT

2004-03-19 Thread Ryan Moore
Steven Stern wrote: I am an idiot. The sock file was defined with one name in sendmail.mc and another in the configuration file for the milter itself. I made them the same and sendmail is happy. so what's supposed to happen when it detects a virus? When I send myself a message with eicar.com attac