On Fri, 27 May 2011 16:41:36 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas articulated:
> What is the point of annoying recipients that someone has sent them a
> virus? I thought the whole point of virus checking was that
> recipients should NOT receive infected mail .
Unless the analysis was faulty, AKA "False/
On 24.05.11 17:48, Annette Jaekel wrote:
> I am new to clamav and sendmail milter. I tried to configure sendmail-8.14.4
> with clamav-milter 0.97,
> set necessary sendmail milter macros
>
> O Milter.macros.connect=j, _, {daemon_name}, {if_name}, {if_addr}
> O Milter.macros.helo={tls_version}, {ci
* G.W. Haywood wrote:
> When I run into issues like this I usually fall back to Perl scripts.
> In addition to ClamAV I use MIMEDefang as a milter. If you're able to
> code with Perl you can pretty much do whatever you want fairly easily.
> Perl is, er, an acquired taste, but once you're familiar
Hi there,
On Wed, 25 May 2011 Annette Jaekel wrote:
> I am new to clamav and sendmail milter.
You like punishment then? :)
> ... clean mails go trough clamav-milter and deliver to all
> recipients. But always if a virus is found for a mail with more than
> one recipient, only the last recipient
On 05/24/11 17:48, Annette Jaekel wrote:
> If I understood right, the script
> gets the recipients from the sendmail macro rcpt_addr. Now clean mails go
> trough
> clamav-milter and deliver to all recipients. But always if a virus is found
> for
> a mail with more than one recipient, only the la
On 8 Apr 2005 at 8:09, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Thursday 07 Apr 2005 19:00, .rp wrote:
> > Clamav-milter is running and inspecting the email via sendmail. It
> > does seem be catching the phishing emails that get by, but not the
> > virii. I manually inspected the mail and had a virus reported. wit
On Thursday 07 Apr 2005 19:00, .rp wrote:
> Clamav-milter is running and inspecting the email via sendmail.
> It does seem be catching the phishing emails that get by, but not the virii.
> I manually inspected the mail and had a virus reported.
> with f-prot:
> /var/spool/mail/fakebox->document_ex
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 08:34, Graham Murray wrote:
> Scott Deacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > No ... /usr/local/bin is NOT set as a path in the init but it is in the
> > path of the user,
> >
> > When/How is clamdscan initiated? The error message suggested to me that
> > it is called by milte
Scott Deacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No ... /usr/local/bin is NOT set as a path in the init but it is in the
> path of the user,
>
> When/How is clamdscan initiated? The error message suggested to me that
> it is called by milter as required so I assumed the PATH of the user
> would be the d
No ... /usr/local/bin is NOT set as a path in the init but it is in the
path of the user,
When/How is clamdscan initiated? The error message suggested to me that
it is called by milter as required so I assumed the PATH of the user
would be the determining factor.
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 03:40, Gra
Scott Deacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been trying to implement Flinn Meuller's Clamav Milter (20030926)
> packages on OpenBSD 3.3 (stable). I've worked through a number of issues
> but I'm stumped on this one.My emails show the following in the header:
>
> X-Virus-Scanned: sh: clamdscan:
For the record, I have never tested the milter configuration. ;-)
On Tuesday, October 7, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Scott Deacon wrote:
Good day,
I've been trying to implement Flinn Meuller's Clamav Milter (20030926)
packages on OpenBSD 3.3 (stable). I've worked through a number of
issues
but I'm stum
Sorry, I've forgotten the version:
ClamAV version 20030522
David
- Original Message -
From:
David
Dubois
To: clamav-users
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:16
AM
Subject: [clamav-users] Problem with
clamav-milter
Dear all,
I've got an error in clama
13 matches
Mail list logo
