On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:01:56 +0100
Nagy Ferenc László <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:02:36PM -0700, Lucas Albers wrote:
>
>
>
> > When a new mail comes out, you initiate a new download within 5-10
> > minutes. I see the following problems with this:
> > virusdb mailings
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 12:02:36PM -0700, Lucas Albers wrote:
> When a new mail comes out, you initiate a new download within 5-10 minutes.
> I see the following problems with this:
> virusdb mailings would need to be gpg signed, and procmail script would
> need to verify gpg signature. Not sure
Erik Corry said:
> I use procmail to put mails from the clamav-virusdb list in the folder
> above.
>
> This way I update within one hour if there is an update, otherwise
> nothing happens. You could up this to once every half hour without
> overloading the servers I think.
>
The most efficient u
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 23:16:23 -0500 (EST)
jef moskot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this has been asked a long time ago, but with all the new
> mirrors up and the recent barrage of new worms, I've been wondering
> what the ClamAV team suggests for a reasonable update rate?
>
> One of my users
On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:16:23PM -0500, jef moskot wrote:
> I know this has been asked a long time ago, but with all the new mirrors
> up and the recent barrage of new worms, I've been wondering what the
> ClamAV team suggests for a reasonable update rate?
>
> One of my users has suggested once
