Re: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan Error 2

2004-07-19 Thread Tomasz Papszun
On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 at 7:38:56 -0500, John Fleming wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 10:14 PM > Subject: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan Error 2 > > > ClamAV (clamd) was working fine until I updated D

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan Error 2

2004-07-19 Thread Steve Lenti
have you tried installing from source?? On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 07:38:56 -0500, John Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 10:14 PM > Subject: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan Erro

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan Error 2

2004-07-19 Thread John Fleming
- Original Message - From: "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2004 10:14 PM Subject: [Clamav-users] Clamdscan Error 2 > ClamAV (clamd) was working fine until I updated Debian unstable today. Now > I'm getting the following header added to A

Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory.

2004-02-20 Thread Stephen Gran
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 06:46:45PM -0500, Michael H. Martel said: > --On Friday, February 20, 2004 5:33 PM +0100 Tomasz Kojm > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Don't use procmail and clamav globally - such a solution is > >completely inefficient. You should scan the mail directly on the MTA > >leve

Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory.

2004-02-20 Thread Michael H. Martel
--On Friday, February 20, 2004 5:33 PM +0100 Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Don't use procmail and clamav globally - such a solution is completely inefficient. You should scan the mail directly on the MTA level. You're suggesting something like the milter option yes ? Is it really going

RE: [Clamav-users] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory.

2004-02-20 Thread James Nelson
Interesting. If you follow this path, I would be very interested in seeing your proc recipe. james -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomasz Kojm Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 10:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Clamav-users

Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan : ERROR: Can't get absolute pathname of current working directory.

2004-02-20 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 06:31:42 -0500 "Michael H. Martel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > however, I want to invoke it in /etc/procmailrc as a global for all > users. When I do this, clamdscan returns the error : Don't use procmail and clamav globally - such a solution is completely inefficient. You sh

Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan error

2003-12-04 Thread McKeever Chris
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 22:13 , Thomas Lamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >McKeever Chris wrote: > >> # clamdscan --version >> clamdscan / ClamAV version 0.65 >> >> >> ]# clamdscan >> connect(): No such file or directory >> ERROR: Can't connect to clamd. >> >> --- SCAN SUMMARY --- >>

Re: [Clamav-users] clamdscan error

2003-12-04 Thread Thomas Lamy
McKeever Chris wrote: # clamdscan --version clamdscan / ClamAV version 0.65 ]# clamdscan connect(): No such file or directory ERROR: Can't connect to clamd. --- SCAN SUMMARY --- Infected files: 0 Time: 0.001 sec (0 m 0 s) any ideas? clamav.conf file? or permissions issues? I sugge