Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-19 Thread René Berber
On 10/19/2010 3:16 AM, Török Edwin wrote: > On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:45:32 -0500 > René Berber wrote: > >> On 10/18/2010 6:22 PM, René Berber wrote: >> >>> it does pass all 7 tests with -O3. >> >> And the load times go down to just over 2 minutes, 50% of what they >> where. > > OK, much better (ig

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-19 Thread Török Edwin
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:45:32 -0500 René Berber wrote: > On 10/18/2010 6:22 PM, René Berber wrote: > > > it does pass all 7 tests with -O3. > > And the load times go down to just over 2 minutes, 50% of what they > where. OK, much better (ignore my previous mail then). configure by default uses

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-19 Thread Török Edwin
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:12:44 -0500 René Berber wrote: > On 10/18/2010 4:08 PM, René Berber wrote: > > On 10/18/2010 3:42 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > > > >> For me it is (UltraSPARC-T2 @1165 MHz): > >> official signatures: Time: 22.255 sec (0 m 22 s) > >> official + sanesecurity: Time: 90.417 sec (1

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-18 Thread René Berber
On 10/18/2010 6:22 PM, René Berber wrote: > it does pass all 7 tests with -O3. And the load times go down to just over 2 minutes, 50% of what they where. -- René Berber ___ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-18 Thread René Berber
On 10/18/2010 5:12 PM, René Berber wrote: > With -O3 it fails one of the tests: > > PASS: check_clamav > PASS: check_freshclam.sh > PASS: check_sigtool.sh > SKIP: check_unit_vg.sh > PASS: check1_clamscan.sh > PASS: check2_clamd.sh > FAIL: check3_clamd.sh > PASS: check4_clamd.sh > SKIP: check5_cla

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-18 Thread René Berber
On 10/18/2010 4:08 PM, René Berber wrote: > On 10/18/2010 3:42 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > >> For me it is (UltraSPARC-T2 @1165 MHz): >> official signatures: Time: 22.255 sec (0 m 22 s) >> official + sanesecurity: Time: 90.417 sec (1 m 30 s) >> >> That is with gcc 3.4.6. >> With gcc 4.4.3 I get 74s l

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-18 Thread René Berber
On 10/18/2010 3:42 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > For me it is (UltraSPARC-T2 @1165 MHz): > official signatures: Time: 22.255 sec (0 m 22 s) > official + sanesecurity: Time: 90.417 sec (1 m 30 s) > > That is with gcc 3.4.6. > With gcc 4.4.3 I get 74s load time. > With Sun studio 12 it takes 241s, (the

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-18 Thread Török Edwin
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:22:55 -0500 René Berber wrote: > On 10/18/2010 3:06 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > > [snip] > > These look like the largest, I'll do some tests on the Solaris box I > > have access to and see how long it takes there. > > Here's my result of moving out of the way all .ndb files

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-18 Thread René Berber
On 10/18/2010 3:06 PM, Török Edwin wrote: [snip] > These look like the largest, I'll do some tests on the Solaris box I > have access to and see how long it takes there. Here's my result of moving out of the way all .ndb files: Mon Oct 18 15:12:09 2010 -> Reading databases from /usr/local/share

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-18 Thread Török Edwin
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:32:01 -0500 René Berber wrote: > On 10/18/2010 12:54 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > > > What kind of signatures do those 3rdparty databases have? > > Can you use wc -l, and then group them by extension? > > I would expect hashes (.mdb, .hdb) to load quite fast, since we have > >

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd load time

2010-10-18 Thread René Berber
On 10/18/2010 12:54 PM, Török Edwin wrote: > What kind of signatures do those 3rdparty databases have? > Can you use wc -l, and then group them by extension? > I would expect hashes (.mdb, .hdb) to load quite fast, since we have > lots of those too, and .ndb, or maybe .ldb to load a bit more slowl