Kevin T. said:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short
>> time ago it
>> > now wants
>> > to update viruses.db, but the checksum fails after the download
Actually, I'm running ClamAV version 0.70-rc and getting the same message.
Anyone else having this issue?
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >
> > I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago
At 01:11 PM 3/26/2004, you wrote:
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 21:42:57 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>
> I just ran freshclam again and instead of downloading viruses.db and
> then giving me a checksum error it now claims:
>
> Connected to clamav.elektrapro.com.
> Reading md5 sum (viruses.md5): ERROR
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 21:42:57 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>
> I just ran freshclam again and instead of downloading viruses.db and
> then giving me a checksum error it now claims:
>
> Connected to clamav.elektrapro.com.
> Reading md5 sum (viruses.md5): ERROR: md5 sum not found on remote se
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:27:23 -
"Randal, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is time for you to erase ALL of your clamAV
> files, wherever you have them scattered, and reinstall
> and reconfigure, so you only have one set of .conf files
> and one set of .cvd files, and then reboot.
R
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:14:08 -0600, Mark Novak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jim
>>
>My number of signatures is exactly the same as yours. When I grep for
>somefool, I stop at M.
>
>I do still have the old style signatures located in /usr/share/clamav
>from clam-0.65. Tomasz mentioned in an
All,
I think it is time for you to erase ALL of your clamAV
files, wherever you have them scattered, and reinstall
and reconfigure, so you only have one set of .conf files
and one set of .cvd files, and then reboot.
At least then you'll know where to look and/or get
meaningful error messages.
I s
Mark Novak Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:14 AM
> It seems to me that I am updated, as I have the same number of
> signatures as you do, but when I grep it for somefool, maybe it is
> going to the old set in the other directory?
This, apparently, is my problem. Read my post from yesterday about
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Novak
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:14 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh
>
> My number of signatures is exactly the same as
> I do still have the old style signatures located in
> /usr/share/clamav from clam-0.65. Tomasz mentioned
> in an earlier post that this could be the problem.
> I am wondering if I should change the freshclam.conf
> database line from /var/lib/clamav to /usr/share/clamav?
>
> It seems to me t
Jim,
On Mar 26, 2004, at 8:43 AM, Jim Maul wrote:
I did exactly that, deleted the cvd files and re-ran freshclam. I am
only showing through SomeFool.M, no O, P or P-dll.
Any ideas or tips appreciated.
Thanks,
Mark
Well, being that this makes no sense, the only thing i can suggest is
to t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Novak
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 5:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh
>
>
> I did exactly that, deleted the cvd files
At 07:09 PM 3/25/04, you wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 18:39:29 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> At 05:24 PM 3/25/04, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
>> >On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago it
>
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 18:39:29 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> At 05:24 PM 3/25/04, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> >On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago it
> >> now wants
> >> to update viruses.
At 05:24 PM 3/25/04, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
>On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>>
>> I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago it
>> now wants
>> to update viruses.db, but the checksum fails after the download. The
>> mirror at ozforces
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 16:18:38 -0800, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
>
> I'm updating from clamav.elektrapro.com and starting a short time ago it
> now wants
> to update viruses.db, but the checksum fails after the download. The
> mirror at ozforces
> does the same thing.
>
> This isn't the issu
At 02:56 PM 3/25/2004, you wrote:
On Thursday 25 March 2004 10:36 pm, Mark Novak wrote:
> > If running the same command on your server does not show the
> > SomeFool.P then
> > your definitions are NOT up to date. If freshclam insists on saying
> > they
> > are up to date, i would try deleting th
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 18:19:02 -0500, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
>
> Per Tomasz, I first checked the number of signatures reported by freshclam
> and it was reporting the correct number. So Per Jim, I deleted both main.cvd
> and daily.cvd from /var/lib/clamav and ran freshclam again. It downloaded
Colin A. Bartlett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim Maul Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:28 PM
>
> > If freshclam insists on saying they
> > are up to date, i would try deleting them totally and running freshclam
> > again. Maybe that will clear up the problem.
>
> Per Tomasz, I first checked the
Jim Maul Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 4:28 PM
> If freshclam insists on saying they
> are up to date, i would try deleting them totally and running freshclam
> again. Maybe that will clear up the problem.
Per Tomasz, I first checked the number of signatures reported by freshclam
and it was rep
On Thursday 25 March 2004 10:36 pm, Mark Novak wrote:
> > If running the same command on your server does not show the
> > SomeFool.P then
> > your definitions are NOT up to date. If freshclam insists on saying
> > they
> > are up to date, i would try deleting them totally and running freshclam
>
See below -
On Mar 25, 2004, at 3:28 PM, Jim Maul wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Colin A.
Bartlett
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh
Another poster pointed to
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Colin A.
> Bartlett
> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clam not fresh
>
>
> > Another poster pointed to te
Colin A. Bartlett said:
>> Another poster pointed to testvirus.org for testing. I think
>> you'll
>> find some methods of delivery more effective than others and that
>> clamav will miss some of these.
>
> They're not being detected by clam even when running them right
> through
> clamscan on the
> Another poster pointed to testvirus.org for testing. I think you'll
> find some methods of delivery more effective than others and that
> clamav will miss some of these.
They're not being detected by clam even when running them right through
clamscan on the command prompt. I think it's because
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004 at 9:52:26 -0500, Colin A. Bartlett wrote:
>
> I've upgraded my ClamAV and I'm no longer getting errors on freshclam.
> However it doesn't seem to be updated. I noticed some viruses slipping
> through and ran them through the online scanner. Some were identified as
> SomeFool.
Colin A. Bartlett said:
> Hello All
>
> I've upgraded my ClamAV and I'm no longer getting errors on
> freshclam.
> However it doesn't seem to be updated. I noticed some viruses
> slipping
> through and ran them through the online scanner. Some were
> identified as
> SomeFool.P. I grepped my sigtool
27 matches
Mail list logo
