On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 16:57 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
[...]
> Yes, saw these on other packages from F11 and I hadn't time to figure
> out how to circumvent that (which is the main reason for using F10
FWIW, it's here
http://www.devheads.net/linux/fedora/development/fedora-11-epel-5-md5-issu
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 01:33 -0700, martinnitram wrote:
[...]
> Just wonder, if use EPEL repository src rpm, why don't use the binary rpm
> from repo directly?
Never tried that recently.
If I have to guess: missing dependencies, need for newer packages, some
packages may have been renamed and pro
Just wonder, if use EPEL repository src rpm, why don't use the binary rpm
from repo directly?
BTW, some of servers of our clients also running FC3, which using the
source tar from clamav.net, seem work so far so good.
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 07:50 -0500, M. Lewis
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 07:19 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
> Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
> >> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
> >> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
> >
> > I'm
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
>> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
>> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
>
> I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4.
>
>> this, but I'm wondering
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
>> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
>> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
>
> I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4.
>
>> this, but I'm wondering
Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:54 +0200, aCaB wrote:
> []
>> you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
>
> FC4 has gcc-4.0.2. So FC3 should have a gcc-3.
> Just do `rpm -q gcc` or `yum install gcc` and see what it has/delivers.
>
> Be
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 06:22 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
I'm doing the same on Fedora Core 4.
> this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up t
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 13:54 +0200, aCaB wrote:
[]
> you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
FC4 has gcc-4.0.2. So FC3 should have a gcc-3.
Just do `rpm -q gcc` or `yum install gcc` and see what it has/delivers.
Bernd
--
Firmix Software GmbH
On 25.05.2009 / 07:01:05 -0500, M. Lewis wrote:
> aCaB wrote:
> > M. Lewis wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > you you have gcc 2.95 or less, then forget about compiling it. You will
> > get any sort of compilation errors. Working them around is not trivial BTW.
> >
> > If you can somehow get a gcc 3.x i
On 2009-05-25 15:01, M. Lewis wrote:
> aCaB wrote:
>
>> M. Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
>>> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
>>> this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to
aCaB wrote:
> M. Lewis wrote:
>> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
>> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
>> this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
>> this system.
>>
>> Previously all upgrades
M. Lewis wrote:
> I have a client who for a variety of reasons is still running Fedora
> Core 3. I know he has worse problems that Clamav being out of date with
> this, but I'm wondering if there is a way to get Clamav up to date on
> this system.
>
> Previously all upgrades were done via RPM,
13 matches
Mail list logo
