Nigel Horne wanted us to know:
>On Friday 13 Aug 2004 8:08 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
>
>> I wonder. If you hit the max threads and are using the clamav-milter,
>> then it will drop through. Try picking up the max threads in
>> clamav.conf and see if that makes a difference.
>Not true.
I thought the
On Friday 13 Aug 2004 8:08 pm, Todd Lyons wrote:
> I wonder. If you hit the max threads and are using the clamav-milter,
> then it will drop through. Try picking up the max threads in
> clamav.conf and see if that makes a difference.
Not true.
-Nigel
David Williams wanted us to know:
>Hello all,
>
>We are having the same problem, we are using Clamav at our perimeter,
>then it forwards it to another server running Symantec. In the last
>week, Clamav has caught ~1200 viruses, but two got through. Symantec
>called it [EMAIL PROTECTED] Accordin
On Friday 13 Aug 2004 13:18, David Williams wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We are having the same problem, we are using Clamav at our perimeter,
> then it forwards it to another server running Symantec. In the last
> week, Clamav has caught ~1200 viruses, but two got through. Symantec
> called it [EMAI
On Friday 13 Aug 2004 13:59, I wrote:
> Do you have the original e-mail that demonstrates the problem? If so please forward
> it to me and I'll look at it for you.
Don't forget to zip with the password 'virus'.
-Nigel
--
Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter.
NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. I
Hello all,
We are having the same problem, we are using Clamav at our perimeter,
then it forwards it to another server running Symantec. In the last
week, Clamav has caught ~1200 viruses, but two got through. Symantec
called it [EMAIL PROTECTED] According to Symantec's website, "When a
file is
Arthur Kerpician wrote:
Todd Lyons wrote:
Brian Morrison wanted us to know:
>Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by backup.ccina.ro with
>SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:53:00
>+0300
This is the last line of Received headers, so it never says exactly
what host it
Todd Lyons wrote:
Brian Morrison wanted us to know:
>Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by backup.ccina.ro with
>SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:53:00
>+0300
This is the last line of Received headers, so it never says exactly
what host it came from.
It was
Brian Morrison wanted us to know:
>> >Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by backup.ccina.ro with
>> >SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:53:00
>> >+0300
>> This is the last line of Received headers, so it never says exactly
>> what host it came from.
>It was recei
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:25:35 -0700 in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Todd Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Received: from localhost [127.0.0.1] by backup.ccina.ro with
> >SpamAssassin (2.60 1.212-2003-09-23-exp); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:53:00
> >+0300
>
> This is the last line of Received headers, so it n
Todd Lyons wrote:
Arthur Kerpician wanted us to know:
Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
What is that?
Received: from backup.ccina.ro ([193.41.216.99]) by main-server.ccina.ro
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:51:46 +0300
Silly question but are you running QS
Arthur Kerpician wanted us to know:
>Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0
What is that?
>Received: from backup.ccina.ro ([193.41.216.99]) by main-server.ccina.ro
>with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:51:46 +0300
Ok so it made it through the Linux box (backup) to t
Damian Menscher wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
Still, about 4-5 times a day, NAV detects [EMAIL PROTECTED] I repeat,
NAV/Exchange server is behind my RH Linux/ClamAV machine which is
supposed to do all filtering (AV/Spam) until it passes the mails to the
Exchange. I saved a
Damian Menscher wrote:
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
Still, about 4-5 times a day, NAV detects [EMAIL PROTECTED] I repeat,
NAV/Exchange server is behind my RH Linux/ClamAV machine which is
supposed to do all filtering (AV/Spam) until it passes the mails to the
Exchange. I saved a
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
> Still, about 4-5 times a day, NAV detects [EMAIL PROTECTED] I repeat,
> NAV/Exchange server is behind my RH Linux/ClamAV machine which is
> supposed to do all filtering (AV/Spam) until it passes the mails to the
> Exchange. I saved a copy of the worm
15 matches
Mail list logo
