Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:09:18 -0700
> Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>>
>>> libclamav is right, the entry at the line 53 in rogue.hdb is incorrect
>>> (double colon before the virus name)
>>>
>> Interesting that clamscan -d rogue.hdb didn't c
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:09:18 -0700
Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> >
> > libclamav is right, the entry at the line 53 in rogue.hdb is incorrect
> > (double colon before the virus name)
> >
>
> Interesting that clamscan -d rogue.hdb didn't catch that, but the
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> libclamav is right, the entry at the line 53 in rogue.hdb is incorrect
> (double colon
> before the virus name)
>
Interesting that clamscan -d rogue.hdb didn't catch that, but the error
also didn't cause clamd to die nor even fail to find viruses.
dp
__
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:45:58 -0500
> libclamav is right, the entry at the line 53 in rogue.hdb is incorrect
> (double colon
> before the virus name)
Fixed... Thanks Tomasz...
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.ne
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 04:45:58 -0500
René Berber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Steve Basford wrote:
>
> > The new Rogue signature database contains hashes of known Rogue
> > Anti-Virus software and also contains known Fake Videos/Codecs.
> > Most of these files are currently being distributed via t
Steve Basford wrote:
> The new Rogue signature database contains hashes of known Rogue
> Anti-Virus software and also contains known Fake Videos/Codecs.
> Most of these files are currently being distributed via the current wave
> of fake CNN/Msnbc/BBC news and fake video emails (54 signatures cu
