>
> 0 as result code should be only used, when everything is ok - no
> error or viruses. Otherwise, from the source of clamdscan it seems,
> that it has 3 result codes, but I might have missed something:
> 0 - everything is ok
> 1 - virus found
> 2 - error
Be careful, this may violate the
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 09:34, Franck wrote:
> Does this mean you want submissions of encrypted zip archives if they
> aren't getting caught?
> 'Cause I'm getting hit by what Symantec identifies as Bagle.J in
> encrypted archives that have slipped by Clam even with the newest
> updates.
The message
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 09:34, Franck wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> > Submission: n/a
> > Sender: Diego d'Ambra
> > Virus name: Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd
> > Notes: Generic signature to detect password-protected Bagle zip files
> > The signature matches encrypted zip files.
>
> Does this mean you wan
