RE: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format(was:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

2006-01-20 Thread Matthew.van.Eerde
Brian Morrison wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:46:21 +0100 in > [EMAIL PROTECTED] "M.S. Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like >> 15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three' > > That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal > sh

RE: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was:W32.Blackmail.E@ mmundetected)

2006-01-20 Thread Bowie Bailey
Nigel Horne wrote: > Bowie Bailey wrote: > > Brian Morrison wrote: > > > M.S. Lucas wrote: > > > > > > > > In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like 15:30 is `half four' > > > > and not 'half past three' > > > > > > That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal > > > shortha

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

2006-01-20 Thread Bill Maidment
Jerry K wrote: All Americans is a pretty broad finger to point. North America alone consist of Canada, the US and Mexico. I think that you should limit your frustration to the US alone. Jerry K He! He! Where I come from Americans = US (both Yankees and southerners). Mexicans, Canadians, A

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was:W32.Blackmail.E@ mmundetected)

2006-01-19 Thread Nigel Horne
Bowie Bailey wrote: Brian Morrison wrote: M.S. Lucas wrote: In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like 15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three' That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal shorthand for half *past* four whereas the Dutch (and German IIRC) is mor

RE: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was:W32.Blackmail.E@ mmundetected)

2006-01-19 Thread Bowie Bailey
Brian Morrison wrote: > M.S. Lucas wrote: > > > In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like > > 15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three' > > That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal > shorthand for half *past* four whereas the Dutch (and German IIRC) is > more liter

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

2006-01-19 Thread Jerry K
All Americans is a pretty broad finger to point. North America alone consist of Canada, the US and Mexico. I think that you should limit your frustration to the US alone. Jerry K (I still don't understand why the Americans put the month in front of the day -- it makes no logical sense oth

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

2006-01-19 Thread Brian Morrison
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:46:21 +0100 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] "M.S. Lucas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like > 15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three' That would really confuse people in the UK. "Half four" is verbal shorthand for half *past* four whereas t

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

2006-01-19 Thread Niek
On 1/19/2006 5:46 PM +0100, M.S. Lucas wrote: It's written as it's spoken, I think. Today's date is 'January 19th, 2006,' not '19 January, 2006' or '2006, January, 19.' In Dutch it is '19 January, 2006' just like 15:30 is `half four' and not 'half past three' Yeh and we say meters not 3 fee

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

2006-01-19 Thread M.S. Lucas
- Original Message - From: "Shayne Lebrun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > (I still don't understand why the Americans put the month in front of > the day -- it makes no logical sense other than to be different > from/than everyone else). > Have a nice day .. uuuggghhh It's written as it's spoke

RE: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

2006-01-19 Thread Shayne Lebrun
> > (I still don't understand why the Americans put the month in front of > > the day -- it makes no logical sense other than to be different > > from/than everyone else). > > Have a nice day .. uuuggghhh It's written as it's spoken, I think. Today's date is 'January 19th, 2006,' not '19 January

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format

2006-01-19 Thread Chuck Swiger
John W. Baxter wrote: On 1/19/06 7:41 AM, "JT Justman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Probably we should all start using ISO-8601 -MM-DD format since otherwise half the dates in the year are ambiguous. Call it a friendly compromise. Which is what we started using in-house several months ago.

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was: [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected)

2006-01-19 Thread John W. Baxter
On 1/19/06 7:41 AM, "JT Justman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Probably we should all start using ISO-8601 -MM-DD format since > otherwise half the dates in the year are ambiguous. Call it a friendly > compromise. Which is what we started using in-house several months ago. What's wrong with

RE: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was: W32.Blackmail.E @mm undetected)

2006-01-19 Thread Cormack, Ken
> Probably we should all start using ISO-8601 -MM-DD format since > otherwise half the dates in the year are ambiguous. Call it a friendly > compromise. Actually, DD-MM-YY is standard in the U.S. military, as is 24-hr time. But I like JT's suggestion - It makes it OH SO EASY to sort-by-date.

Re: [Clamav-users] OT: American date format (was: [EMAIL PROTECTED] undetected)

2006-01-19 Thread JT Justman
Bill Maidment wrote: > (I still don't understand why the Americans put the month in front of > the day -- it makes no logical sense other than to be different > from/than everyone else). > Have a nice day .. uuuggghhh I'm not entirely sure, either. Instinctually, DD-MM- seems just as funky to