Re: [Clamav-users] Massive problems clamav-0.90.x under Solaris 10

2007-03-16 Thread Christian Kuehn
Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:29:32 -0500 > Alex Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:54:38 -0700 >> Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> My personal opinion is that clamd is self-refreshing the databases at >>> the instant a new database is be

Re: [Clamav-users] Massive problems clamav-0.90.x under Solaris 10

2007-03-15 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 17:29:32 -0500 Alex Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:54:38 -0700 > Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > My personal opinion is that clamd is self-refreshing the databases at > > the instant a new database is being installed. If so then it

Re: [Clamav-users] Massive problems clamav-0.90.x under Solaris 10

2007-03-15 Thread Alex Moore
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:54:38 -0700 Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My personal opinion is that clamd is self-refreshing the databases at > the instant a new database is being installed. If so then it may be a > worthwhile thing to have a semaphore available as a socket query or > as

Re: [Clamav-users] Massive problems clamav-0.90.x under Solaris 10

2007-03-15 Thread Dennis Peterson
Christian Kuehn wrote: Hi, we detect some massive problems with the 0.90-series of clamav under Solaris 10, the clamd use 90-99% of all CPU after 15min and the maschine got a load of minimum 50. The logfile shows like that: Thu Mar 15 07:22:31 2007 -> /var/spool/exim/scan/1HRqqc-0002q2-MA/1HRq