Bill James wrote:
Mailscanner directly edits the mail queues is why it needs this
I personally use Postfix and it is NOT recommended to use Mailscanner is
it is known to truncate mails, or loose them all together in Postfix as
it also directly manages Postfix mail queues. Even the setup for
Mailsc
Kevin Spicer wrote:
Peter, I'm going to have to slightly disagree with you on that,
certainly as far as my MailScanner Mandrake boxes are concerned. The
bahaviour I see is that mail sent by programs that call sendmail
directly (as opposed to having their own SMTP engine) is queued in the
clientmqu
Mailscanner directly edits the mail queues is why it needs this
I personally use Postfix and it is NOT recommended to use Mailscanner is
it is known to truncate mails, or loose them all together in Postfix as
it also directly manages Postfix mail queues. Even the setup for
Mailscanner with Postfix
On Wed, 2004-01-21 at 22:19, Peter Bonivart wrote:
> Leif Neland wrote:
> > How does this fit in with sendmail 8.12 already having two queues, mqueue
> > and mqueue-client?
>
> You really should have posted this on the MailScanner list since nothing
> of this is Clam related.
I'll second that,
Leif Neland wrote:
How does this fit in with sendmail 8.12 already having two queues, mqueue
and mqueue-client?
You really should have posted this on the MailScanner list since nothing
of this is Clam related. However the mqueue-client does not have a
physical queue, instead it's a way of pickin
