Eric Scopinho wrote:
But if I do that, some side effects could happen like:
- I'll need free space to store the file.
- The infected packets may get in while I store the next packets to scan.
- I have to download the whole file before send it to the end-user.
I'm trying to develop some sort of
Dennis Peterson wrote:
Eric Scopinho said:
But if I do that, some side effects could happen like:
- I'll need free space to store the file.
You're not properly committed and funded to support this activity.
Maybe.
- The infected packets may get in while I store the next packets to scan
Jason Haar wrote:
Eric Scopinho wrote:
But if I do that, some side effects could happen like:
- I'll need free space to store the file.
- The infected packets may get in while I store the next packets to scan.
- I have to download the whole file before send it to the end-user.
How else coul
Eric Scopinho said:
> But if I do that, some side effects could happen like:
>
> - I'll need free space to store the file.
You're not properly committed and funded to support this activity.
> - The infected packets may get in while I store the next packets to scan.
There is no way on earth you c
Jason Haar wrote:
> However, I think you'll be out of luck. The only "network virus
> scanners" I know of are big beasts - because they effectively have to
> inline translate packets back to specific protocols (such as
> SMB/CIFS), pull the data content out, then run real AV over the fully
> formed
Eric Scopinho wrote:
But if I do that, some side effects could happen like:
- I'll need free space to store the file.
- The infected packets may get in while I store the next packets to scan.
- I have to download the whole file before send it to the end-user.
How else could you catch a virus
But if I do that, some side effects could happen like:
- I'll need free space to store the file.
- The infected packets may get in while I store the next packets to scan.
- I have to download the whole file before send it to the end-user.
I'm trying to develop some sort of firewall+anti-virus us
Eric Scopinho wrote:
> The problem is that I'm using libclamav directly (not clamd), and I
> dont't have the entire zip file. While the file is sent over the
> network, passing through my firewall, I'm catching the packets,
> storing each one and scanning using cl_scandesc from libclamav. Catch
> i
The problem is that I'm using libclamav directly (not clamd), and I
dont't have the entire zip file. While the file is sent over the
network, passing through my firewall, I'm catching the packets, storing
each one and scanning using cl_scandesc from libclamav. Catch it?
Samuel Benzaquen wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Scopinho
>
> Long Question:
> I'm doing some tests with libipq (kind of userspace packet filter).
> I get network packets, write them in small temp files and scan using
> cl_scandesc from libclamav, i
10 matches
Mail list logo
