On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Antony Stone wrote:
> Sorry - I asked too soon. I downloaded the copy from your website and
> shovelled it through my mailserver, and got the following report:
:-) I was posting quickly and didn't mention the payload.
I based my assessment of it as a virus on the fact that
On Sunday 04 April 2004 9:53 pm, Tomas Charvat wrote:
> well come on guys... did you check out link, whitch he posted?
> [something].pif was attachment
>
> you better check brain before asking sutch question
Hence my second posting sent 4 minutes after the first, once I'd discovered
that ClamAV
April 04, 2004 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Just received a brand new virus
> On Sunday 04 April 2004 2:34 am, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
>
> > Received what looks like a brand new virus, not recognized by clam or
> > google.
>
> What makes you think it is a vi
On Sunday 04 April 2004 7:18 pm, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Sunday 04 April 2004 2:34 am, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> > Received what looks like a brand new virus, not recognized by clam or
> > google.
>
> What makes you think it is a virus? What does it do? Was it recognised
> by any other
On Sunday 04 April 2004 2:34 am, Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
> Received what looks like a brand new virus, not recognized by clam or
> google.
What makes you think it is a virus? What does it do? Was it recognised by
any other A-V product?
Regards,
Antony.
--
I'm pink, therefore I'm S
On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 20:34:25 -0500 (EST)
"Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Received what looks like a brand new virus, not recognized by clam or
> google.
>
> I've just submitted it on the clam web site.
>
> Headers below for people to add quick filters, full mbox avail at
