On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 at 14:30:32 +0200, Niek wrote:
> Tomasz Papszun said the following on 8/10/2004 1:45 PM GMT+2:
> >On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 at 13:39:57 +0300, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
> >
> >>Clamdscan is called by qmail-scanner-1.23 and don't remember
> >>setting any -r option anywhere.
> >
> >I don
Tomasz Papszun said the following on 8/10/2004 1:45 PM GMT+2:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 at 13:39:57 +0300, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
Because these warnings from clamdscan have been introduced just
recently (they are needed to help avoid repeated complaints like
"I use 'clamdscan --mbo
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 at 13:39:57 +0300, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
> Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> >
> >Which options you start clamd with - is irrelevant here.
> >
> >It matters which options you call clamdscan with!
> >
> I was using a snapshot (clamav-20040805.tar.gz) when getting this
> warning. Now I r
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 at 11:42:16 +0300, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
Hi all,
Is anybody getting this message in the mail notifications?
---clamdscan results ---
^
WARNING: Ignoring option -r: please edit clamav.conf instead.
---
Couldn't find anything related
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 at 11:42:16 +0300, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is anybody getting this message in the mail notifications?
> ---clamdscan results ---
^
> WARNING: Ignoring option -r: please edit clamav.conf instead.
> ---
>
> Couldn't find anything related to thet -r switch
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
; Hi all,
; Is anybody getting this message in the mail notifications?
; ---clamdscan results ---
; WARNING: Ignoring option -r: please edit clamav.conf instead.
; ---
Whatever process is using the 'clamdscan' command is passing the -r flag
to it which
On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 09:42, Arthur Kerpician wrote:
> Hi all,
> Is anybody getting this message in the mail notifications?
> ---clamdscan results ---
> WARNING: Ignoring option -r: please edit clamav.conf instead.
> ---
>
> Couldn't find anything related to thet -r switch. I start clamd only
> w