On 25 Mar 2004 16:41:21 +0100
Tarjei Knapstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 21:03, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:28:53 -0500
> > "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> > > --
> > > ClamAV update process started at Su
On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 21:03, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:28:53 -0500
> "Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --
> > ClamAV update process started at Sun Mar 7 17:31:59 2004
> > ERROR: Maximal time (1200 seconds) reached.
>
> We are awar
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 16:20, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
>
> On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:13 PM, Steven P. Donegan wrote:
>
>
> This is assuming everyone's clocks are set in sync? :-)
>
You don't use ntpd? :)
--
Tarjei
---
This SF.Net email is sp
On Mar 16, 2004, at 10:13 PM, Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Hmmm, I just do a freshclam from chron rather than let it run as a
daemon - as a new user (I just downloaded, installed, integrated
with my anti-spam/anti-virus proxy - home built, today). I
Chris Meadors wrote:
Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Hmmm, I just do a freshclam from chron rather than let it run as a
daemon - as a new user (I just downloaded, installed, integrated with
my anti-spam/anti-virus proxy - home built, today). Is doing this in
any way a negative thing?
I don't think
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Hmmm, I just do a freshclam from chron rather than let it run as a
daemon - as a new user (I just downloaded, installed, integrated with
my anti-spam/anti-virus proxy - home built, today). Is doing this in
any way a negative thing?
Not if you s
Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Hmmm, I just do a freshclam from chron rather than let it run as a
daemon - as a new user (I just downloaded, installed, integrated with
my anti-spam/anti-virus proxy - home built, today). Is doing this in
any way a negative thing?
Not if you set it to run on random mi
Steven P. Donegan wrote:
Hmmm, I just do a freshclam from chron rather than let it run as a
daemon - as a new user (I just downloaded, installed, integrated with my
anti-spam/anti-virus proxy - home built, today). Is doing this in any
way a negative thing?
I don't think it hurts, and from the r
Lucas Albers wrote:
This is a hack, but I run monit on my servers to restart failed services.
Works well, it's a hack but it sure jacks my perceived uptime.
Tomasz Kojm said:
And that was it. There hasnt been another entry since and freshclam
quit after it. I supposed it is acceptable that du
This is a hack, but I run monit on my servers to restart failed services.
Works well, it's a hack but it sure jacks my perceived uptime.
Tomasz Kojm said:
>> And that was it. There hasnt been another entry since and freshclam
>> quit after it. I supposed it is acceptable that due to network
>> i
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tomasz
> Kojm
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 3:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Freshclam died
>
>
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:28:53 -0500
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 11:28:53 -0500
"Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running 0.67-1 from RPM on redhat 9.
>
> I used to run freshclam from cron but since the daemonized 0.67
> freshclam was released i have been using it that way to reduce load on
> freshclam servers. Anyway, this morn
12 matches
Mail list logo