On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 17:14:01 +0100
Ollie Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to say I needed to reorder the patch since it didn't
> compile as provided (the original patch did).
>
> The line "pthread_mutex_t gh_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;" ended
> up in the checksymlink functi
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 10:54:47 +0100
> Ollie Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for the patch. I've applied it and will let you know if there
> > continue to be problems.
>
> The last patch was broken. Attached you
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 08:28:42AM -0400, Robert Blayzor wrote:
> Did this make it into 0.75.1?
0.75.1 was released on July 30th. This patch was written today. So, I guess the
answer is that it's not in any of the 'stable' releases.
Yours,
Ollie
--
Oliver CookSystems Architect, Clarane
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
Thanks for the patch. I've applied it and will let you know if there
continue to be problems.
The last patch was broken. Attached you will find a correct one.
Did this make it into 0.75.1?
--
Robert Blayzor, BOFH
INOC, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP: http://www.inoc.net/~dev/
Key fin
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 12:40:18PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> The last patch was broken. Attached you will find a correct one.
Thanks. I'm now running with this one. Will let you know if I get any problems
with the new patch.
Ol.
--
Oliver CookSystems Architect, Claranet UK
[EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004 10:54:47 +0100
Ollie Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the patch. I've applied it and will let you know if there
> continue to be problems.
The last patch was broken. Attached you will find a correct one.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTE
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 07:51:08PM +0200, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> Ollie Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > limits=0xbfbffa20, options=27, copt=0x80564c0) at scanner.c:240
> > 240 if ((he = gethostbyname(cpt->strarg)) == 0) {
> > (gdb) p cpt->strarg
> > $7 = 0x805a0c0 "80.168.70.18
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:49:18 +0100
Ollie Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> limits=0xbfbffa20, options=27, copt=0x80564c0) at scanner.c:240
> 240 if ((he = gethostbyname(cpt->strarg)) == 0) {
> (gdb) p cpt->strarg
> $7 = 0x805a0c0 "80.168.70.183"
>
> Since the call to gethostby
On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:49:18 +0100
Ollie Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Ollie Cook wrote:
> > I have recompiled with debugging symbols, so I will be able to
> > provide a more comprehensive backtrace the next time this occurs.
>
> With debugging symbol
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:24:50AM +0100, Ollie Cook wrote:
> I have recompiled with debugging symbols, so I will be able to provide a more
> comprehensive backtrace the next time this occurs.
With debugging symbols the backtrace is:
(gdb) c
Continuing.
[Switching to process 33496, thread 24]
Pr
10 matches
Mail list logo
