Hi,
reiner otto wrote:
> Only from a few years of expirience running a few small mail-servers
> on the web with ClamAV, I have never seen a virus on the connected
> windows clients , which are protected using AVG. So for mail at
> least, I would consider ClamAV as "good enough". I also had both
I have done testing of ClamAV (through the ClamAV LiveCD that I make)
and Norton (latest version) in the shop that I work in and generally
ClamAV has been at least as thorough as Norton because of at least two
things.
A) When scanning with the LiveCD, you have access to otherwise protected
Windows
> I just ran across this. I question how accurate it is though.
>
> http://www.sunbelt-software.com/ihs/alex/avtestresults_2D2008q1.pdf
I believe that tests clamwin, not clamav, in spite of what it says.
>
> --
> Gerard
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Nigel
__
