RE: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-10 Thread Michael St. Laurent
> RPMs (works fine on Fedora 1 and RedHat 9 at least) are available at > https://www.olen.net/downloads/clamav-20040204-1.i386.rpm > https://www.olen.net/downloads/clamav-milter-20040204-1.i386.rpm > > SRPM: > https://www.olen.net/downloads/clamav-20040204-1.src.rpm I was just wondering if you ha

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-05 Thread Nigel Horne
On Wednesday 04 Feb 2004 8:14 pm, Ola Thoresen wrote: > I have now tested the latest tar.gz from > http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-devel-20040204.tar.gz and can > verify that the problem with memory allocations on special binhex-files > has been fixed. > I have about 10 different files that

RE: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-05 Thread Tom Walsh
> > Hi, > > I wonder if i have to wait for the next stable version or use > the last cvs. I've download the last cvs of clamav and i'm > reading the changelog and found very interesting things > there. Is the current CVS is stable for an use in production > environment ? Is the next stable wi

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-04 Thread Matthew Trent
On Wednesday 04 February 2004 12:14 pm, Ola Thoresen wrote: > I have now tested the latest tar.gz from > http://www.clamav.net/snapshot/clamav-devel-20040204.tar.gz and can > verify that the problem with memory allocations on special binhex-files > has been fixed. > I have about 10 different files

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-04 Thread Ola Thoresen
Wed, 04 Feb 2004 at 00:23 GMT Ola Thoresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > Tue, 03 Feb 2004 at 23:26 GMT Matthew Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote >> On Tuesday 03 February 2004 03:09 pm, Nigel Horne wrote: >>> 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! >>> >>> I have just disabled b

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-04 Thread Thomas Lamy
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: Nigel Horne wrote: 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate this. A sidenote to everyone using the CVS version: It seems sf.net's public CVS service lags behind the develo

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-04 Thread Cedric Foll
Michael St. Laurent wrote: Are you using clamav-milter for the email scanning? No. --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. Februar

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Justin
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Brian Bruns wrote: > On Tuesday, February 03, 2004 10:35 PM [GMT-5=EST], Justin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/src/clamav/clamav-devel-20040201]#> make > > Making all in libclamav > > make[1]: Entering directory > > `/usr/local/src/clamav/clam

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Brian Bruns
On Tuesday, February 03, 2004 10:35 PM [GMT-5=EST], Justin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/local/src/clamav/clamav-devel-20040201]#> make > Making all in libclamav > make[1]: Entering directory > `/usr/local/src/clamav/clamav-devel-20040201/libclamav' > cd .. && \ > /bin/sh

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Justin
On 3 Feb 2004, Cedric Foll wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if i have to wait for the next stable version or use the last > cvs. > I've download the last cvs of clamav and i'm reading the changelog and > found very interesting things there. > Is the current CVS is stable for an use in production environ

RE: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Michael St. Laurent
Are you using clamav-milter for the email scanning? > -Original Message- > From: Matthew Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 8:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS > > >

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Ola Thoresen
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 at 23:26 GMT Matthew Trent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > On Tuesday 03 February 2004 03:09 pm, Nigel Horne wrote: >> 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! >> >> I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate >> this. >> >> -Nigel >

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Matthew Trent
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 03:09 pm, Nigel Horne wrote: > 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! > > I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate > this. > > -Nigel Doh, I must have misinterpreted comments in the Changelog to mean it's been f

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Nigel Horne wrote: 4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate this. I had success with the patch produced by Thomas Lamy at least for the 2 message that I have - are there some issues with that one ? Stefan

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Nigel Horne
4) Yes I am working on a solution and yes I am aware of it! I have just disabled binhex decoding in CVS while I further investigate this. -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.bandsman.co.uk ---

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Nigel Horne
On Tuesday 03 Feb 2004 4:21 pm, Matthew Trent wrote: > Except for the huge memory leak that crashed > everything this weekend, it's been really stable. ;-) (Supposed to be fixed > now.) Just for the avoidance of any doubt, since there are a lot of incorrect rumours going around: 1) It is

Re: [Clamav-users] Wait for next stable version or use CVS

2004-02-03 Thread Matthew Trent
On Tuesday 03 February 2004 07:18 am, Cedric Foll wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if i have to wait for the next stable version or use the last > cvs. > I've download the last cvs of clamav and i'm reading the changelog and > found very interesting things there. > Is the current CVS is stable for an use