Re: [Clamav-users] Suggestion: Feature Freeze

2004-07-27 Thread Dennis Skinner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Todd Lyons wrote: | Perhaps a daily CVS snapshot (or whatever | frequency you deem useful but not overloading) made by you would be a | good solution. Then we could establish functionality based on date and | it would be quite easy to move forward or b

Re: [Clamav-users] Suggestion: Feature Freeze

2004-07-27 Thread Matt
> > > > I'd like to second that. Those of us depending on clamav to catch > > stuff can't afford to upgrade in the middle of the day for new > > signatures to work. > > Why not? If you say "because it's a production system and it needs to be > tested", then that is a business decision to accept

Re: [Clamav-users] Suggestion: Feature Freeze

2004-07-27 Thread Todd Lyons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Trog wanted us to know: >> > Could we perhaps stop adding features for a few days and get a stable >> > release out? It would really help. >> I'd like to second that. Those of us depending on clamav to catch stuff >> can't afford to upgrade in the m

Re: [Clamav-users] Suggestion: Feature Freeze

2004-07-27 Thread Trog
On Mon, 2004-07-26 at 21:59, John Madden wrote: > > Could we perhaps stop adding features for a few days and get a stable > > release out? It would really help. > > I'd like to second that. Those of us depending on clamav to catch stuff > can't afford to upgrade in the middle of the day for new

Signatures and versions... RE: [Clamav-users] Suggestion: Feature Freeze

2004-07-26 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
> I'd like to second that. Those of us depending on clamav to catch stuff > can't afford to upgrade in the middle of the day for new signatures to > work. And why don't these new signatures work? Has that interface not > yet stabilized? > > Thanks, > John Just wondering... If signatures come

Re: [Clamav-users] Suggestion: Feature Freeze

2004-07-26 Thread John Madden
> I'd like to suggest a feature freeze. Watching this list, it appears > there have been stability problems with nearly every release since 0.72 > (which is rock solid). But 0.72 doesn't catch the latest viruses. In > fact, it's not clear that even the latest release (0.75) will catch > viruses

RE: [Clamav-users] Suggestion: Feature Freeze

2004-07-26 Thread Jeffrey Kroll
I'd like to suggest a feature freeze. Watching this list, it appears there have been stability problems with nearly every release since 0.72 (which is rock solid). But 0.72 doesn't catch the latest viruses. In fact, it's not clear that even the latest release (0.75) will catch viruses with uneve